From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-105463-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 12340 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2004 00:20:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11941 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2004 00:20:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO x93.infopact.nl) (212.29.160.93)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 19 Nov 2004 00:20:02 -0000
Received: from steven.lr-s.tudelft.nl (128-65-dsl.ipact.nl [84.35.65.128])
	by x93.infopact.nl (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAJ0JqPN021165;
	Fri, 19 Nov 2004 01:19:54 +0100
From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb@suse.de>
To: Ziemowit Laski <zlaski@apple.com>, Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@synopsys.COM>
Subject: Re: generalized lvalues
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 00:40:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
Cc: Matt Austern <austern@apple.com>, Fariborz Jahanian <fjahanian@apple.com>,
        gcc mailing list <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <8AD5AEEF-3914-11D9-8BD2-000A95BCF344@apple.com> <20041118100933.A4942@synopsys.com> <F5E55C80-39BF-11D9-8317-00039390FFE2@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <F5E55C80-39BF-11D9-8317-00039390FFE2@apple.com>
Organization: SUSE Labs
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200411190120.53447.stevenb@suse.de>
X-CanItPRO-Stream: NoScan
X-Spam-Score: undef - spam-scanning disabled
X-Canit-Stats-ID: 1775161 - 37f97b3d7538
X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca)
X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00656.txt.bz2

On Friday 19 November 2004 01:14, Ziemowit Laski wrote:
> For the same reason, Matt's assertion that the feature "breaks valid
> C++ programs" is inherently contradictory,
> since programs containing it cannot be valid. :-)

If you're in a discussion you should read what others say ;-)

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-11/msg00609.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-11/msg00607.html

Gr.
Steven