From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16848 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2004 19:44:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16800 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2004 19:44:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO grillo.net) (69.106.60.198) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 19 Nov 2004 19:44:50 -0000 Received: from last.grillo.net (last [192.168.2.157]) by grillo.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iAJJin24025829; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 11:44:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from grio@last.grillo.net) Received: from last.grillo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by last.grillo.net (8.12.9/8.12.2) with ESMTP id iAJJimU7023426; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 11:44:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by last.grillo.net (8.12.9/8.12.2/Submit) id iAJJim8e023425; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 11:44:48 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Grillo Message-Id: <200411191944.iAJJim8e023425@last.grillo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Organization: President, Grillo Networking, Inc. To: Dale Johannesen , Matt Austern , gcc mailing list , Geoffrey Keating , GNUStep , Helge Hess , Mike Stump , Dale Johannesen Subject: Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? References: <442C1616-387F-11D9-9815-0030654C2998@hamburg.de> <3D92B030-39C3-11D9-8317-00039390FFE2@apple.com> <1B18C7B1-39E3-11D9-B2D5-000A95BCF344@apple.com> <926459B3-3A5F-11D9-9965-000A95D7CD40@apple.com> Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 20:04:00 -0000 Versions: dmail (macosx) 2.7/makemail 2.13 X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00692.txt.bz2 Organize a lunch and work this out! --Dan ----- Begin forwarded message: From: Dale Johannesen Sender: discuss-gnustep-bounces+dan_grillo=grillo.net@gnu.org Subject: Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? To: Matt Austern Cc: gcc mailing list , Geoffrey Keating , GNUStep , Helge Hess , Mike Stump , Dale Johannesen Date: Fri, Nov 19 11:16:53 On Nov 18, 2004, at 8:25 PM, Matt Austern wrote: > Apple already pays Geoff. Zem, Geoff, and I are all Apple employees. > > This discussion should probably happen offline. It's in Apple's > interest for ObjC++ to get into mainline. It's also in Apple's > interest to make sure that there aren't any changes that hurt compiler > performance. It's silly for this discussion to be happening on an > international email list when most of the people participating in it > have offices on the same floor of the same building. Yep. At least it may be educating the people who have the silly idea Apple is some kind of monolith.... _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep ----- End forwarded message -- Dan Grillo dan@grillo.net 650-299-1470