From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32716 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2004 20:22:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32483 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2004 20:22:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 19 Nov 2004 20:22:33 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iAJKMVKN019738; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:22:31 -0500 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iAJKMUr20913; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:22:30 -0500 Received: from frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.27]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id iAJKMTcv024594; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:22:29 -0500 Received: from frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iAJKMSPE018195; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:22:28 -0800 Received: (from rth@localhost) by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iAJKMS0V018194; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:22:28 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 21:39:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Richard Sandiford Cc: Bob Wilson , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [cft] subreg validation round 2 Message-ID: <20041119202228.GA18178@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Richard Sandiford , Bob Wilson , gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <20041117184009.GA12257@redhat.com> <419BA411.5090801@tensilica.com> <20041117194553.GA12418@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00697.txt.bz2 On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 01:17:07PM +0000, Richard Sandiford wrote: > I realise that they are in general, but it's fairly clear that, > for example, FUNCTION_VALUE is allowed to return BLKmode REGs. > Routines like hard_function_value have code that specifically > handles such cases. I think you have a point. I'll revert that part of the patch and fix this a different way. And update the documentation. r~