From: Phil Edwards <phil@codesourcery.com>
To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@chuckr.org>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Helge Hess <helge.hess@opengroupware.org>,
discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 10:07:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041122080600.GA5366@disaster.jaj.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041121205644.D4002@april.chuckr.org>
On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 08:58:05PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Phil Edwards wrote:
>
> >From a lurker, one who likes objc a lot, is there a written spec on what
> the heck is objc++?
Not really. There's certainly nothing formal like an ISO standard.
It essentially comes down to the set of documents published by Apple.
There are probably some links on gcc.gnu.org under the Readings section;
if they're not sufficient, then pester the ObjC++ crowd to submit patches.
--
"It won't be any more frightening than the time
I climbed up an elevator shaft with my teeth."
- Sunny Baudelaire
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-22 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-17 10:28 Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
2004-11-17 20:51 ` Mike Stump
2004-11-17 21:53 ` Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
2004-11-17 22:28 ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-17 22:54 ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-17 23:02 ` Nicolas Roard
2004-11-17 23:31 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-11-17 23:17 ` Phil Edwards
2004-11-17 23:50 ` Alex Perez
2004-11-18 0:06 ` Joe Buck
2004-11-18 0:35 ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-18 0:46 ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-18 0:53 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-11-18 1:18 ` Giovanni Bajo
2004-11-18 23:22 ` Geoffrey Keating
2004-11-18 23:28 ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-19 0:57 ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-19 1:26 ` Rogelio Serrano
2004-11-19 1:41 ` Helge Hess
2004-11-19 4:26 ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-19 5:49 ` Matt Austern
2004-11-19 6:42 ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-19 7:52 ` Phil Edwards
2004-11-22 3:22 ` Chuck Robey
2004-11-22 10:07 ` Phil Edwards [this message]
2004-11-22 10:31 ` Ranjit Mathew
2004-11-19 19:44 ` Dale Johannesen
2004-11-19 20:04 ` Dan Grillo
2004-11-19 20:08 ` Dave Korn
2004-11-19 13:31 Richard Kenner
2004-11-19 20:22 ` Ziemowit Laski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041122080600.GA5366@disaster.jaj.com \
--to=phil@codesourcery.com \
--cc=chuckr@chuckr.org \
--cc=discuss-gnustep@gnu.org \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=helge.hess@opengroupware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).