From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Ziemowit Laski <zlaski@apple.com>
Subject: Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 22:23:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200411232305.56192.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0411232131310.9421@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
> The removal of crufty code, improving the maintainability of the compiler,
> is sufficient justification for the removal of a dubious extension which
> does not add expressive power to the language.
It's not that dubious since most compilers seem to have it, at least in the
pointer case. And no, please, don't say it's because they tried to play
catch-up with GCC, I would not believe you.
And, from the user's viewpoint, this kind of argument has no merit anyway.
--
Eric Botcazou
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-23 22:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 116+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-18 3:50 generalized lvalues Matt Austern
2004-11-18 3:52 ` Andrew Pinski
2004-11-18 4:01 ` Andrew Pinski
2004-11-18 4:18 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-11-18 4:21 ` Andrew Pinski
2004-11-18 4:27 ` Matt Austern
2004-11-18 7:15 ` Joe Buck
2004-11-18 7:37 ` Matt Austern
2004-11-18 13:17 ` Giovanni Bajo
2004-11-18 17:57 ` Joe Buck
2004-11-18 18:28 ` Mike Stump
2004-11-18 18:44 ` Joe Buck
2004-11-19 1:39 ` Mike Stump
2004-11-19 4:52 ` Matt Austern
2004-11-19 22:24 ` Michael Matz
2004-11-19 22:30 ` Robert McNulty Junior
2004-11-20 1:00 ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-20 1:20 ` Joe Buck
2004-11-20 1:51 ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-20 5:04 ` Joe Buck
2004-11-20 5:17 ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-22 20:54 ` generalized lvalues -- patch outline Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-22 21:01 ` Andrew Pinski
2004-11-22 21:11 ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-22 21:39 ` Matt Austern
2004-11-22 22:11 ` Joe Buck
2004-11-22 22:12 ` Matt Austern
2004-11-23 0:06 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-11-23 0:04 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-11-23 0:27 ` Mike Stump
2004-11-24 20:40 ` Kai Henningsen
2004-11-23 0:11 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-11-23 1:19 ` Matt Austern
2004-11-23 1:26 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-11-23 1:32 ` Dale Johannesen
2004-11-23 1:42 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-11-23 1:45 ` Andrew Pinski
2004-11-23 1:55 ` Dale Johannesen
2004-11-23 1:56 ` Andrew Pinski
2004-11-23 2:12 ` Dale Johannesen
2004-11-23 2:10 ` Marcus G. Daniels
2004-11-23 9:43 ` Eric Botcazou
2004-11-23 18:27 ` Aaron W. LaFramboise
2004-11-22 21:23 ` Nathan Sidwell
2004-11-22 22:33 ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-23 0:09 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-11-23 9:54 ` Nathan Sidwell
2004-11-23 13:35 ` Michael Matz
2004-11-23 14:56 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-11-23 15:02 ` Michael Matz
2004-11-23 15:15 ` Andrew Pinski
2004-11-23 15:47 ` Michael Matz
2004-11-23 15:56 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-11-23 15:50 ` Steve Naroff
2004-11-23 15:51 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-11-23 16:50 ` Eric Botcazou
2004-11-23 17:01 ` Paul Koning
2004-11-23 17:16 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-11-23 18:03 ` Thomas Kunert
2004-11-23 18:30 ` Nathan Sidwell
2004-11-23 18:57 ` Thomas Kunert
2004-11-23 21:21 ` Paul Koning
2004-11-23 21:52 ` Thomas Kunert
2004-11-23 15:51 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-11-23 16:12 ` Michael Matz
2004-11-23 16:31 ` Richard Guenther
2004-11-23 16:44 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-11-23 20:16 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-11-23 15:01 ` Nathan Sidwell
2004-11-23 15:09 ` Michael Matz
2004-11-23 19:11 ` Matt Austern
2004-11-23 21:10 ` Eric Botcazou
2004-11-23 21:34 ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-23 22:09 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-11-23 22:23 ` Eric Botcazou [this message]
2004-11-23 22:27 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-11-24 0:05 ` Eric Botcazou
2004-11-24 0:07 ` Steven Bosscher
2004-11-24 0:32 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-11-25 8:41 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-11-25 20:41 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-11-25 21:54 ` Matt Austern
2004-11-25 23:27 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-11-29 18:06 ` Joe Buck
2004-11-29 18:57 ` Matt Austern
2004-11-23 23:27 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-11-23 22:24 ` Nathan Sidwell
2004-11-23 0:07 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-11-24 20:43 ` Kai Henningsen
2004-11-24 23:09 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-11-24 23:17 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-11-22 21:31 ` Richard Henderson
2004-11-23 0:11 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-11-23 0:03 ` Jonathan Lennox
2004-11-20 1:40 ` generalized lvalues Joseph S. Myers
2004-11-18 19:11 ` Alex Rosenberg
2004-11-18 4:24 ` Matt Austern
2004-11-18 5:33 ` Dale Johannesen
2004-11-18 17:14 ` Fariborz Jahanian
2004-11-18 18:23 ` Joe Buck
2004-11-19 0:20 ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-19 0:40 ` Steven Bosscher
2004-11-19 1:20 ` Joe Buck
2004-11-19 2:00 ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-18 23:36 ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-18 23:37 ` Matt Austern
2004-11-18 23:49 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-11-19 1:38 ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-19 2:52 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-11-19 3:56 ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-19 4:22 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-11-19 13:10 ` Nathan Sidwell
2004-11-19 21:58 ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-18 23:44 ` Andrew Pinski
2004-11-18 23:45 ` Joe Buck
2004-11-25 4:42 ` Aaron W. LaFramboise
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200411232305.56192.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr \
--to=ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=zlaski@apple.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).