From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20478 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2004 23:55:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20455 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2004 23:55:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.libertysurf.net) (213.36.80.90) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 23 Nov 2004 23:55:46 -0000 Received: from dyn-83-156-222-3.ppp.tiscali.fr (83.156.222.3) by mail.libertysurf.net (7.1.026) id 41A30B5F000B0065; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 00:51:58 +0100 From: Eric Botcazou To: "Joseph S. Myers" Subject: Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 00:05:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Ziemowit Laski References: <4D2CF60C-3919-11D9-8BD2-000A95BCF344@apple.com> <200411232305.56192.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200411240051.19500.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00865.txt.bz2 > One user's description of lvalue casts is "... there is absolutely zero > point to them ... The whole extension is just braindamaged ... I bet 99% > of the people on this list have no clue what the exact semantics of the > above are." (Linus Torvalds in > ). I agree. Note that Linus doesn't mention the pointer case. Since we are at lkml exegesis, take a look at http://www.kerneltraffic.org/kernel-traffic/kt20041009_276.html#3 -- Eric Botcazou