From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-105673-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 25762 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2004 00:03:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25300 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2004 00:02:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO x93.infopact.nl) (212.29.160.93)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 24 Nov 2004 00:02:52 -0000
Received: from steven.lr-s.tudelft.nl (128-65-dsl.ipact.nl [84.35.65.128])
	by x93.infopact.nl (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAO02YjO017185;
	Wed, 24 Nov 2004 01:02:45 +0100
From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb@suse.de>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>,
        "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 00:07:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Ziemowit Laski <zlaski@apple.com>
References: <4D2CF60C-3919-11D9-8BD2-000A95BCF344@apple.com> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0411232219040.9421@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <200411240051.19500.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
In-Reply-To: <200411240051.19500.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
Organization: SUSE Labs
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200411240103.42124.stevenb@suse.de>
X-CanItPRO-Stream: NoScan
X-Spam-Score: undef - spam-scanning disabled
X-Canit-Stats-ID: 1882153 - 58cf68db5cbb
X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca)
X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00866.txt.bz2

On Wednesday 24 November 2004 00:52, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> <but Willy Tarreau replied, "Tell that to gcc developpers who constantly
> break compatibility between versions. I even have userland programs which
> do not compile anymore with gcc-3.3 and which I don't even know how to
> 'fix' (workaround ?).">

Heh, that sounds very much like a complaint I got recently from
another suse developer, who told me he thinks that "icc is now
more compatible with gcc than gcc itself".  :-)

Gr.
Steven