From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18096 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2004 05:35:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18071 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2004 05:35:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cgf.cx) (66.30.17.189) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 24 Nov 2004 05:35:35 -0000 Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 35BC71B3E5; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 00:36:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 06:58:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: Cygwin , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, mingw-dvlpr@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: stdcall lib functions with exception throwing callbacks vs Dwarf2 EH Message-ID: <20041124053623.GB13336@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: Cygwin , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, mingw-dvlpr@lists.sourceforge.net References: <001701c4d1ab$949322e0$0a6d65da@DANNY> <41A3FE7A.60005@aaronwl.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41A3FE7A.60005@aaronwl.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00877.txt.bz2 On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 09:22:34PM -0600, Aaron W. LaFramboise wrote: >Do any Windows system routines have any function local cleanup that >they'd need to do registered with SEH, or are they OK with suddenly >being zapped out of existance at user code call points? If cygwin's signal handling code is any indication, Windows system routines will become very unhappy if you just zap the PC away somewhere down (up?) the stack. On Windows 9x you'll eventually cause a system crash, in fact. cgf