From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12799 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2004 04:42:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12763 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2004 04:42:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO web52909.mail.yahoo.com) (206.190.39.186) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 25 Nov 2004 04:42:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 73121 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Nov 2004 04:42:20 -0000 Message-ID: <20041125044219.73115.qmail@web52909.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.164.100.133] by web52909.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 25 Nov 2004 04:42:19 GMT Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 07:15:00 -0000 From: Ankit Jain Subject: Re: Accuracy of clock To: Nathan Sidwell Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <41A4990D.30506@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00942.txt.bz2 where shall i ask for bugs related to gcc ? thanks --- Nathan Sidwell wrote: > Ankit Jain wrote: > > I want to confirm if the clock like gettimeofday > or > > clock_gettime has any bugs and if then how much > > inaccurate are these clock. i want to know the > time > > taken by my program in microseconds > > there is at least one bug in the set of all > 'gettimeofday' functions that > have ever existed :) > > * you are in the wrong place, ask somewhere relevent > to your system > > * you do not specify your system, so you'll need to > determine that > > nathan > > > -- > Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com > :: CodeSourcery LLC > nathan@codesourcery.com :: > http://www.planetfall.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk > > ________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends today! Download Messenger Now http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html