From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15974 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2004 20:52:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15913 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2004 20:52:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 6 Dec 2004 20:52:47 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iB6Kqfqs031165; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 15:52:41 -0500 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iB6Kqer23719; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 15:52:40 -0500 Received: from frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.27]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id iB6Kqcso008990; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 15:52:39 -0500 Received: from frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iB6KqcA8018973; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 12:52:38 -0800 Received: (from rth@localhost) by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iB6KqclU018972; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 12:52:38 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 20:52:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Dorit Naishlos Cc: Steven Bosscher , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: New and undocumented target hooks (cf. PR3386, a regression) Message-ID: <20041206205238.GA18560@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Dorit Naishlos , Steven Bosscher , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <6972371.1102079776822.SLOX.WebMail.wwwrun@extimap.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg00270.txt.bz2 On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 09:41:51PM +0200, Dorit Naishlos wrote: > TARGET_VECTORIZE_BUILTIN_MASK_FOR_STORE is actually not yet used by the > vectorizer - shall I remove its occurrences for now, or leave it as an > indication of what is to come? Unless you think this bit will get done for 4.0, take it out. r~