From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15611 invoked by alias); 8 Dec 2004 16:08:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15557 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2004 16:08:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cgf.cx) (66.30.17.189) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 8 Dec 2004 16:08:01 -0000 Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 370311B494; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 11:08:42 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 16:08:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: mh-mingw32 Message-ID: <20041208160842.GA2155@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <41B71F86.1090708@st.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41B71F86.1090708@st.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg00309.txt.bz2 On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 03:36:38PM +0000, Joern RENNECKE wrote: >Why does config/mh-mingw32 clear LIBGCC2_DEBUG_CFLAGS ? Debugging >information in the target libgcc of a mingw32 hosted cross tool chain >is quite useful. From the CVS logs, it looks like this predates my tenure as windows maintainer by several years. It is probably a historical artifact. Unless Danny Smith objects, I'd say feel free to nuke that line. cgf