From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29312 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2004 07:22:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29269 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2004 07:21:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.libertysurf.net) (213.36.80.91) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 10 Dec 2004 07:21:55 -0000 Received: from dyn-83-156-208-138.ppp.tiscali.fr (83.156.208.138) by mail.libertysurf.net (7.1.026) id 41A46BF500427C5C; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 08:18:09 +0100 From: Eric Botcazou To: "Sam Lauber" Subject: Re: Unomitted frame pointers Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 07:22:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <20041210052626.95AF72B2B86@ws5-7.us4.outblaze.com> In-Reply-To: <20041210052626.95AF72B2B86@ws5-7.us4.outblaze.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200412100819.17979.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg00353.txt.bz2 > Clearly some one (or some code) isn't doing its job! The original C code is > attached. I thought -fomit-frame-pointer is supposed to OMIT the frame > pointer! You didn't read all the messages. Do not call your function 'main'. -- Eric Botcazou