From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11352 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2004 22:08:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11302 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2004 22:08:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail1.thewrittenword.com) (67.95.107.114) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 13 Dec 2004 22:08:43 -0000 Received: by mail1.thewrittenword.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 101CA206; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 16:08:43 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 22:08:00 -0000 From: Albert Chin To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: gcc -m64 for Solaris10 x86 Message-ID: <20041213220842.GA51045@mail1.thewrittenword.com> Reply-To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <200412131355.20799.fld@informatik.uni-bremen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg00470.txt.bz2 On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 06:16:23PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote: > Nothing: just bootstrap on Solaris 10/x86 without specifying a specific > configuration triplet. The resulting compiler will automatically support > amd64 code generation when specifying the -m64 option. Note however that > you need to use a recent version of GNU as (from CVS binutils) for the > bootstrap to succeed. You'll probably have to restrict yourself to C at > the moment: the 64-bit libstdc++ didn't build (at least as of a week ago). > Besides, there may be code generation bugs on mainline: building a 64-bit > lsof some time ago seems to have produced wrong code (though I haven't > investigate this in detail yet). So GCC on Solaris 10/x86 will require GNU as? Why isn't /usr/ccs/bin/as good enough? -- albert chin (china@thewrittenword.com)