From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2793 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2004 10:30:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2720 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2004 10:29:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO x93.infopact.nl) (212.29.160.93) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 14 Dec 2004 10:29:58 -0000 Received: from stevenb.14hoog (128-65-dsl.ipact.nl [84.35.65.128]) by x93.infopact.nl (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iBEATkbB022765; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:29:51 +0100 From: Steven Bosscher To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: GTY and const Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:30:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 Cc: Matt Kraai References: <20041213203007.GA4907@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20041213203007.GA4907@localhost.localdomain> Organization: SUSE Labs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200412141131.22395.stevenb@suse.de> X-Spam-Score: undef - spam-scanning disabled X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg00499.txt.bz2 On Monday 13 December 2004 21:30, Matt Kraai wrote: > Would it be better to add a cast around the assignment or to make the > GTY code handle const members? I'd go for the cast. Gr. Steven