From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-114231-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 18573 invoked by alias); 14 May 2005 04:35:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18536 invoked from network); 14 May 2005 04:35:03 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO omta02ps.mx.bigpond.com) (144.140.83.154)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 14 May 2005 04:35:03 -0000
Received: from CPE-203-51-8-15.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([203.51.8.15])
          by omta02ps.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP
          id <20050514043502.ESWQ7537.omta02ps.mx.bigpond.com@CPE-203-51-8-15.nsw.bigpond.net.au>
          for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Sat, 14 May 2005 04:35:02 +0000
From: "Paul C. Leopardi" <leopardi@bigpond.net.au>
Reply-To: paul.leopardi@unsw.edu.au
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Need help creating a small test case for g++ 4.0.0 bug
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 09:59:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.8
References: <200505141216.54326.leopardi@bigpond.net.au> <343aa7274f69aed60ab697ac2eb21f3d@physics.uc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <343aa7274f69aed60ab697ac2eb21f3d@physics.uc.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200505141435.07609.leopardi@bigpond.net.au>
X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00669.txt.bz2

Andrew,
Thanks for reminding me about this. I'll need to take a good look at this. 

The effect of the workaround is to change any instance of _GLUCAT_PRIVATE to 
public. This does not affect the validity or otherwise of the g++ bug I'm 
currently trying to report.

I wrote GluCat at a time when earlier versions of ICC and gcc were not as 
compliant with the C++ standard. I'll have to take the current versions of 
ICC and gcc as correct, and change the code.
Best regards, Paul Leopardi
 
On Sat, 14 May 2005 02:03 pm, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On May 13, 2005, at 10:16 PM, Paul C. Leopardi wrote:
> > +//***************************** workaround for ICC, G++ 3.3+, G++ 4.0+
>
> Why do you need this work around?  Why has this not been filed or really
> fixed in their sources?
>
> -- Pinski