From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13334 invoked by alias); 30 May 2005 17:18:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13323 invoked by uid 22791); 30 May 2005 17:18:49 -0000 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2005 17:18:49 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j4UHImtS019653; Mon, 30 May 2005 13:18:48 -0400 Received: from pobox.toronto.redhat.com (pobox.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.4]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j4UHIgO31960; Mon, 30 May 2005 13:18:42 -0400 Received: from topo.toronto.redhat.com (vpn50-102.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.102]) by pobox.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j4UHIaMX030351; Mon, 30 May 2005 13:18:37 -0400 Received: from topo.toronto.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by topo.toronto.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j4UHIWKi026647; Mon, 30 May 2005 13:18:33 -0400 Received: (from dnovillo@localhost) by topo.toronto.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j4UHIQx1026646; Mon, 30 May 2005 13:18:26 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 18:10:00 -0000 From: Diego Novillo To: Jeffrey A Law Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Janis Johnson Subject: Re: Problem with scan-tree-dump-times in dg.exp Message-ID: <20050530171826.GA24072@topo.toronto.redhat.com> References: <20050530163202.GA21036@topo.toronto.redhat.com> <1117472604.19437.79.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1117472604.19437.79.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg01629.txt.bz2 On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 11:03:24AM -0600, Jeffrey A Law wrote: > In this case I'd replace the .* with _5 and see if it matches > properly. If it does, then I'd tighten the wildcard. > Something like p_[0-9]* > Excellent, that worked. I wonder why is dejagnu so fussy about patterns. Thanks. Diego.