Re: c/c++ validator

[Tommy Vercetti <vercetti@zlew.org>]

On Sunday 19 June 2005 03:03, you wrote:
> Tommy Vercetti <vercetti@zlew.org> writes:
> | On Sunday 19 June 2005 00:32, you wrote:
> | > Something like:
> | >
> | > http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~gregod/STLlint/STLlint.html
> |
> | Yeah, but for more than just STL, and opensource. C++ checker that
> | is going to work for instance for KDE.
> |  Wonder why they use proprietary parser,
>
> maybe because they work? ;-p

> | there are opensource
> | parsers around,  like elsa, or gcc c++ parser.
>
> Elsa does not parse C++.
Elsa is for C/C++, so it says on their website.

> GCC/g++ parser is tightly integrated to GCC.
>
> Most of the tools I know of are either "research projects" (which
> means that they basically "die" when the professor get promoted or the
> students graduate; they are lots of them out there) or are/ use
> proprietary tools.
>
> We need to get GCC/g++ to a competing level of usefulness but the road
> is not quite that straight.

Yep.

Btw, don't have to cc me, I'm reading that list.

-- 
Vercetti