From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-116425-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17160 invoked by alias); 28 Jun 2005 16:15:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 17056 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jun 2005 16:15:42 -0000
Received: from us01smtp1.synopsys.com (HELO boden.synopsys.com) (198.182.44.79)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:15:42 +0000
Received: from mother.synopsys.com (mother.synopsys.com [146.225.100.171])
	by boden.synopsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 30D19DD02; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 09:14:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from piper.synopsys.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mother.synopsys.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA18378;
	Tue, 28 Jun 2005 09:15:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from piper.synopsys.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by piper.synopsys.com (8.12.10/8.12.3) with ESMTP id j5SGFdOe009533;
	Tue, 28 Jun 2005 09:15:39 -0700
Received: (from jbuck@localhost)
	by piper.synopsys.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id j5SGFdER009531;
	Tue, 28 Jun 2005 09:15:39 -0700
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:15:00 -0000
From: Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@synopsys.COM>
To: Jeffrey A Law <law@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>,
	gcc mailing list <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-27)
Message-ID: <20050628161539.GA9524@synopsys.com>
References: <42C0FA31.9000307@codesourcery.com> <1119973190.4621.79.camel@localhost.localdomain> <42C171DD.4090408@codesourcery.com> <1119974795.4621.83.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1119974795.4621.83.camel@localhost.localdomain>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg01136.txt.bz2

On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:06:35AM -0600, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 08:50 -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> > Perhaps you could get a patch put together, test it by staring 
> > atassembly output, and then ask for a volunteer to test it?  I expect 
> > that Joseph could do a test run on PA-HPUX for you.
> It might be the best bet.   I'm going to clean out the bloody box
> to hopefully improve its airflow and give it one more shot.

I can also test hppa-hpux.