From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31937 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2005 00:34:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31903 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jun 2005 00:34:11 -0000 Received: from hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca (HELO hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca) (132.246.100.193) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 00:34:11 +0000 Received: from hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca (hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca (8.12.9-20030917/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j5U0Y9nV025057; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 20:34:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from dave@localhost) by hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca (8.12.9-20030917/8.12.9/Submit) id j5U0Y7s9025056; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 20:34:07 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200506300034.j5U0Y7s9025056@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> Subject: Re: Re: hpux regression vs 4.0.1 To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 00:34:00 -0000 From: "John David Anglin" Cc: law@redhat.com, joe.buck@synopsys.com, mark@codesourcery.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg01288.txt.bz2 > > I have an hpux11.0 box available, and could run tests of your patch > > if you like. > I doubt it would have (or will make) much of a difference at this > point. I don't think anyone could have predicted the muck-up with > the arguments passed to ld and the re-bootstrap that had to run > after working around it. HP bug fixed in one of their many linker updates. The linker requirements are documented but I can appreciate one just expects things to work in an emergency... > As long as I don't kill this 3rd machine I think we'll be OK. If you have problems, please send the patch for testing. Dave -- J. David Anglin dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca National Research Council of Canada (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6602)