From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1738 invoked by alias); 1 Jul 2005 14:13:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1731 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jul 2005 14:13:55 -0000 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 14:13:55 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j61EDsvW002527 for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 10:13:54 -0400 Received: from post-office.corp.redhat.com (post-office.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.227]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j61EDsu19640; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 10:13:54 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (dj.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.0.222]) by post-office.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j61EDph26862; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 10:13:52 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (greed.delorie.com [127.0.0.1]) by greed.delorie.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j61EDlE6011520; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 10:13:47 -0400 Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j61EDfhM011517; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 10:13:41 -0400 Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 14:13:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200507011413.j61EDfhM011517@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: jakub@redhat.com CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org In-reply-to: <20050701095030.GB4740@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz> (message from Jakub Jelinek on Fri, 1 Jul 2005 11:50:30 +0200) Subject: Re: var_tracking question References: <200507010125.j611PlVs019571@greed.delorie.com> <20050701095030.GB4740@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz> X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00032.txt.bz2 > Even on mainline? No, one of our branches. > See PR debug/21946 and > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-06/msg00312.html. > Var-tracking is very broken in that it doesn't care about register > modes, but what I have comitted should at least prevent bogus dwarf2 > location list generation. Ok, that looks like the right fix for me. Thanks!