From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-117040-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 11594 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2005 14:22:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11585 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jul 2005 14:22:48 -0000
Received: from x93.infopact.nl (HELO x93.infopact.nl) (212.29.160.93)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:22:48 +0000
Received: from 63-66-dsl.ipact.nl (63-66-dsl.ipact.nl [84.35.66.63])
	by x93.infopact.nl (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6BEMjiJ020714;
	Mon, 11 Jul 2005 16:22:46 +0200
From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb@suse.de>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Some notes on the Wiki
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:22:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com>
References: <28206.1121071576@www23.gmx.net> <200507111610.57176.stevenb@suse.de> <20050711141928.GB25611@topo.toronto.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050711141928.GB25611@topo.toronto.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200507111622.52272.stevenb@suse.de>
X-Spam-Score: undef - spam-scanning disabled
X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00404.txt.bz2

On Monday 11 July 2005 16:19, Diego Novillo wrote:
> Would a blanket statement at the start of the wiki be enough?
> Who gets to decide this?

I guess that, apart from the legal discussion of whether this enough,
such a statement would not apply to existing content.  It was certainly
not my intention to sign over the various Wiki contributions I have
made to the FSF.

Gr.
Steven