From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29318 invoked by alias); 12 Jul 2005 12:22:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29254 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jul 2005 12:22:09 -0000 Received: from serenity.mcc.ac.uk (HELO serenity.mcc.ac.uk) (130.88.200.93) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 12:22:09 +0000 Received: from compsoc.umu.man.ac.uk ([130.88.22.5] helo=mrtall.compsoc.man.ac.uk) by serenity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD)) id 1DsJlk-0009tE-QV; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 13:21:48 +0100 Received: from cow by mrtall.compsoc.man.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1DsJlk-000GLF-00; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 13:21:48 +0100 Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 12:22:00 -0000 From: Jonathan Wakely To: Karel Gardas Cc: Christian Joensson , Eric Botcazou , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libstdc++ required binutils version [was: Re: gcc 4.0.1 testsuite failures on sparc64-linux: 59 unexpected gcc failures] Message-ID: <20050712122148.GA62290@compsoc.man.ac.uk> References: <5460e333050711235450ecfac2@mail.gmail.com> <200507120932.16709.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <5460e3330507120047690eb80@mail.gmail.com> <5460e3330507120320644666bc@mail.gmail.com> <20050712105715.GA60725@compsoc.man.ac.uk> <20050712114511.GA61562@compsoc.man.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-UoM: Scanned by the University Mail System. See http://www.mcc.ac.uk/cos/email/scanning for details. X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00498.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 01:55:11PM +0200, Karel Gardas wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > >>On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > >> > >>>The minimum binutils for libstdc++ is now 2.15.90.0.1.1, I don't know > >>>about the rest of GCC. > >> > >>does this also apply to other than sparc platforms? I'm cunfused by your > > > >I believe that version applies to x86 linux and x86-64 linux. I don't > >know about Sparc linux. The only hard fact I can confirm first-hand is > >that the latest binutils from FC3 updates works for me on x86_64. > > Interesting! Please have a look at: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00602.html > > those are test results from 4.0.1 release compiled on debian 3.1/AMD64 > (pure64 bit). This debian is using binutils 2.15: [snip] > and IMHO testresults look quite good except abi_check, don't they? i.e. do > you mean updating binutils will resolve abi_check issue in libstdc++ > testsuite? I'd assume yes, based on Benjamin's statement here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2005-06/msg00132.html But I don't know what's really causing the abi_check failure. I've CC'd the libstdc++ list so I hope one of the v3 guys will be able to answer that for you. jon