public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Woodcraft <mattheww@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Where does the C standard describe overflow of signed integers?
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 17:57:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050714175713.GA16889@chiark.greenend.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BEFB337F.ACF1%schlie@comcast.net>

Paul Schlie wrote:
>As optimization seems to be a non-argument, as by analogy all
>optimizations which are available for unsigned arithmetic are
>correspondingly available for signed integer operations; as any signed
>value may then be thought of as being unsigned for the purposes of
>computation and/or comparison.

What about optimising x*2/2 to x?

-M-

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-07-14 17:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-14  1:10 Paul Schlie
2005-07-14  1:59 ` Robert Dewar
2005-07-14  5:28   ` Paul Schlie
2005-07-14 17:57 ` Matthew Woodcraft [this message]
2005-07-14 18:36   ` Paul Koning
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-14 19:09 Paul Schlie
2005-07-14 19:13 ` Robert Dewar
2005-07-14 19:28   ` Paul Schlie
2005-07-14 19:33     ` Robert Dewar
2005-07-14 20:13       ` Paul Schlie
2005-07-15 13:20         ` Georg Bauhaus
2005-07-15 13:33           ` Georg Bauhaus
2005-07-15 14:31           ` Dave Korn
2005-07-16 12:04             ` Georg Bauhaus
2005-07-16 14:26               ` Paul Schlie
2005-07-15 15:03           ` Paul Schlie
2005-07-16 12:12             ` Georg Bauhaus
2005-07-14 20:35     ` Paul Koning
2005-07-14 21:58       ` Paul Schlie
2005-07-15  7:04         ` Avi Kivity
2005-07-11 14:58 Nicholas Nethercote
2005-07-11 15:07 ` Dave Korn
2005-07-11 16:07   ` Nicholas Nethercote
2005-07-11 17:04     ` Dave Korn
2005-07-11 15:15 ` Nathan Sidwell
2005-07-11 15:23   ` Dave Korn
2005-07-12 23:13 ` Michael Meissner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050714175713.GA16889@chiark.greenend.org.uk \
    --to=mattheww@chiark.greenend.org.uk \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).