From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-117557-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 11469 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2005 00:42:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11450 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jul 2005 00:42:24 -0000
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:42:24 +0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j6M0gIqt011391;
	Thu, 21 Jul 2005 20:42:18 -0400
Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j6M0gIV16872;
	Thu, 21 Jul 2005 20:42:18 -0400
Received: from india.sfbay.redhat.com (frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.27])
	by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j6M0gG9S010504;
	Thu, 21 Jul 2005 20:42:17 -0400
Received: from india.sfbay.redhat.com (india.sfbay.redhat.com [127.0.0.1])
	by india.sfbay.redhat.com (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6M0gGXa016386;
	Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:42:16 -0700
Received: (from rth@localhost)
	by india.sfbay.redhat.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j6M0gGh0016385;
	Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:42:16 -0700
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:42:00 -0000
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: Dale Johannesen <dalej@apple.com>
Cc: GCC Development <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: RFA:  Darwin x86 alignment
Message-ID: <20050722004216.GA16353@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>,
	Dale Johannesen <dalej@apple.com>,
	GCC Development <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <ab413abe09cb9295317ffb843db4c797@apple.com> <20050722000047.GA13803@redhat.com> <dfe644fc5c3999eba99dc829d627e609@apple.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <dfe644fc5c3999eba99dc829d627e609@apple.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00921.txt.bz2

On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 05:21:58PM -0700, Dale Johannesen wrote:
> >Nah, you just remove it from target_flags, and control the two
> >new variables from ix86_handle_option.
> 
> OK.  Think that's the better approach?

*shrug*  It's not horrible, I guess.  It preseves existing
semantics when people use the switch; not that I'm a large
fan of switches like this that bork the abi.

My preferred solution is that you don't allow non-compiler
people to invent an ABI.  ;-)


r~