From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28720 invoked by alias); 27 Jul 2005 13:27:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28461 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jul 2005 13:26:55 -0000 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:26:55 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j6RDQqCd001858; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:26:52 -0400 Received: from pobox.toronto.redhat.com (pobox.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.4]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j6RDQkV13166; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:26:46 -0400 Received: from topo.toronto.redhat.com (vpn50-1.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.1]) by pobox.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j6RDQj1M003309; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:26:46 -0400 Received: from topo.toronto.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by topo.toronto.redhat.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6RDQgsX004114; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:26:43 -0400 Received: (from dnovillo@localhost) by topo.toronto.redhat.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j6RDQf8E004113; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:26:41 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:27:00 -0000 From: Diego Novillo To: Richard Guenther Cc: Daniel Berlin , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Latent PTA bug? Message-ID: <20050727132641.GA3995@topo.toronto.redhat.com> References: <20050727124843.GA3546@topo.toronto.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg01131.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 03:09:09PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: > i.e. while we see that the temporary pointer points to array[0], for > SFT.2_6 (i.p) we don't see anything? So if we'd see { SFT.1 } here, too, > we'd be wrong in both cases. -> aka my bug, correct? > What is SFT.1? array[0]? Yes, that's your bug. may-alias sets should have all of array's SFTs. > So why don't we get the points-to set for SFT.2_6? > The solver does not operate on SFTs. Both _p_5 and i should point to array here.