From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-117886-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17578 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2005 13:42:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 17565 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jul 2005 13:41:58 -0000
Received: from bromo.msbb.uc.edu (HELO bromo.msbb.uc.edu) (129.137.3.146)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with SMTP; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:41:58 +0000
Received: by bromo.msbb.uc.edu (Postfix, from userid 501)
	id 7BFB11DC154; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:38:48 -0400 (EDT)
To: howarth@bromo.msbb.uc.edu, schwab@suse.de
Subject: Re: strange error on gcc 4.1.0
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Message-Id: <20050730133848.7BFB11DC154@bromo.msbb.uc.edu>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:42:00 -0000
From: howarth@bromo.msbb.uc.edu (Jack Howarth)
X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg01250.txt.bz2

Andreas,
     Are you sure gnu gcc shouldn't support this? I see -bundle under the
Machine Dependent Options under Darwin options which are not marked as
APPLE-ONLY. I understood that to mean that it should be present in the
gnu gcc compiler (like -all_load which is in the same list and is 
supported). Fortunately MacOS X 10.4 now supports a more linux-like dyload
that can use standard dynamic libraries .so files instead of just bundles
for shared library modules.
              Jack