public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "John David Anglin" <dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
To: ghazi@caipclassic.rutgers.edu (Kaveh R. Ghazi)
Cc: zackw@panix.com, dave.anglin@nrc.ca, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, nix@esperi.org.uk
Subject: Re: What systems (if any) have fprintf_unlocked?
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 19:04:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200508151904.j7FJ4Kar018844@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200508151822.j7FIMVs1013085@caipclassic.rutgers.edu> from "Kaveh R. Ghazi" at Aug 15, 2005 02:22:31 pm

>  > I'm not going to be able to remember exactly.  It might be worth
>  > looking at various proprietary Unixes to see if they've got
>  > fprintf_unlocked, but given the date I don't think I was looking at
>  > one of them.  My best guess is that I simply assumed glibc had it,
>  > since it seemed to have _unlocked variants of all the other stdio
>  > functions.
>  > zw
> 
> Hmm, I found another interesting reference to fprintf_unlocked here:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-03/msg00805.html
> 
> In it Dave points out that hpux is missing fputc_unlocked and
> therefore neither fputs_unlocked or fprintf_unlocked should transform
> into fputc_unlocked.
> 
> Dave, does hpux have fprintf_unlocked or was mentioning it a mistake?

It doesn't have either fprintf_unlocked or fputc_unlocked.

Dave
-- 
J. David Anglin                                  dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca
National Research Council of Canada              (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6602)

      reply	other threads:[~2005-08-15 19:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-14 15:29 Kaveh R. Ghazi
2005-08-14 17:30 ` Zack Weinberg
2005-08-15 15:17   ` Nix
2005-08-15 17:59     ` Zack Weinberg
2005-08-15 18:22       ` Kaveh R. Ghazi
2005-08-15 19:04         ` John David Anglin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200508151904.j7FJ4Kar018844@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca \
    --to=dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca \
    --cc=dave.anglin@nrc.ca \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=ghazi@caipclassic.rutgers.edu \
    --cc=nix@esperi.org.uk \
    --cc=zackw@panix.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).