From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1828 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2005 05:41:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1022 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Aug 2005 05:41:49 -0000 Received: from ns1.nec.com.au (HELO ns1.nec.com.au) (147.76.180.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 05:41:49 +0000 Received: from deer.dd.nec.com.au (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.nec.com.au (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j7I5fjvT022203; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:41:45 +1000 Received: from dvalin.dd.nec.com.au ([172.31.20.70]) by deer.dd.nec.com.au (8.12.5/8.12.5/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j7I5fil0013215; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:41:44 +1000 Received: from dvalin.dd.nec.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dvalin.dd.nec.com.au (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id j7I5dbqh003168; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:39:38 +1000 Received: (from erik@localhost) by dvalin.dd.nec.com.au (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-5) id j7I5dYiZ003166; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:39:34 +1000 From: Erik Christiansen Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 05:41:00 -0000 To: James E Wilson Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, tmohr@s.netic.de Subject: Re: --target=v850-unknown-elf, linker problem Message-ID: <20050818053931.GB727@dd.nec.com.au> References: <200508142255.40310.tmohr@s.netic.de> <20050815080806.GA1026@dd.nec.com.au> <200508151955.01258.tmohr@s.netic.de> <20050816030232.GA1225@dd.nec.com.au> <430395AA.9050103@specifix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <430395AA.9050103@specifix.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg00490.txt.bz2 On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 12:53:14PM -0700, James E Wilson wrote: > Alternatively, patches can be put into bugzilla bug reports. This will > help make sure it won't get forgotten. That's where we were headed, as mentioned at the end of a paragraph in the email with the patch: "Once we're happy with it, I'll put the bug report and patch into bugzilla." (I shoulda made it a separate para. :-) > In this case, since you've already sent the patch, and it looks good, > I'll try to take care of this for you. It'll only take me a moment, and "try" fits poorly with "make sure it won't get forgotten". ;-) (Sorry, the years with quality system responsibilities are showing through.) > I'm doing a v850 build now to verify it and then I plan to add it to > gcc mainline so this will be fixed for the next gcc release, gcc-4.1. If you haven't put it in bugzilla yet, I can free you up for the more important next gcc release. Regards, Erik