From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
To: mark@codesourcery.com (Mark Mitchell)
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org (gcc mailing list)
Subject: Re: Link-time optimzation
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 00:25:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200511170023.jAH0Nm4X005109@earth.phy.uc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <437BB214.1070306@codesourcery.com>
>
> The GCC community has talked about link-time optimization for some time.
> In addition to results with other compilers, Geoff Keating's work on
> inter-module optimization has demonstrated the potential for improved
> code-generation from applying optimizations across translation units.
One thing not mentioned here is how are you going to repesent different
eh personality functions between languages, because currently we cannot
even do different ones in the same compiling at all.
This is very important when compiling some C++ and Java code together.
Or even Objective-C and C++.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-17 0:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-16 22:26 Mark Mitchell
2005-11-16 22:41 ` Andrew Pinski
2005-11-16 22:58 ` Andrew Pinski
2005-11-17 0:02 ` Andrew Pinski
2005-11-17 0:25 ` Andrew Pinski [this message]
2005-11-17 0:52 ` Tom Tromey
2005-11-17 0:26 ` Giovanni Bajo
2005-11-17 0:32 ` Daniel Berlin
2005-11-17 9:04 ` Giovanni Bajo
2005-11-17 16:25 ` Kenneth Zadeck
2005-11-17 1:20 ` Richard Henderson
2005-11-17 1:28 ` Mark Mitchell
2005-11-17 1:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-17 3:35 ` Jeffrey A Law
2005-11-17 14:09 ` Daniel Berlin
2005-11-17 14:48 ` mathieu lacage
2005-11-17 11:41 ` Richard Earnshaw
2005-11-17 21:40 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2005-11-17 23:10 ` Robert Dewar
2005-11-17 23:42 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2005-11-18 2:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-18 9:29 ` Bernd Schmidt
2005-11-18 11:19 ` Robert Dewar
2005-11-18 11:29 ` Richard Earnshaw
2005-11-18 11:40 ` Directly generating binary code [Was Re: Link-time optimzation] Andrew Haley
2005-11-18 12:04 ` Laurent GUERBY
2005-11-18 17:41 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-18 18:35 ` Link-time optimzation Mike Stump
2005-11-18 2:33 ` Dale Johannesen
2005-11-18 3:11 ` Geert Bosch
2005-11-18 18:43 ` Mike Stump
2005-11-18 18:30 ` Mike Stump
2005-11-17 15:54 ` Kenneth Zadeck
2005-11-17 16:41 ` Jan Hubicka
2005-11-18 16:31 ` Michael Matz
2005-11-18 17:04 ` Steven Bosscher
2005-11-18 17:29 ` Michael Matz
2005-11-18 17:24 ` Nathan Sidwell
2005-11-17 1:43 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-11-17 1:53 ` Andrew Pinski
2005-11-17 2:39 ` Kean Johnston
2005-11-17 5:53 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2005-11-17 13:08 ` Ulrich Weigand
2005-11-17 21:42 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2005-11-17 16:17 ` Kenneth Zadeck
2005-11-17 0:52 Chris Lattner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200511170023.jAH0Nm4X005109@earth.phy.uc.edu \
--to=pinskia@physics.uc.edu \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=mark@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).