From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-122003-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 15452 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2005 00:37:37 -0000
Received: (qmail 15445 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Nov 2005 00:37:36 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from x93.infopact.nl (HELO x93.infopact.nl) (212.29.160.93)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 00:37:36 +0000
Received: from 63-66-dsl.ipact.nl (63-66-dsl.ipact.nl [84.35.66.63]) 	by x93.infopact.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jAK0bW29001296; 	Sun, 20 Nov 2005 01:37:33 +0100
From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb@suse.de>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Register Allocation
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 00:37:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
Cc: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod@redhat.com>
References: <1132246411.10098.153.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <1132246411.10098.153.camel@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;   charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200511200137.59191.stevenb@suse.de>
X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0)
X-Spam-Score: 0.60 () [Tag at 5.00] J_CHICKENPOX_21
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00926.txt.bz2

On Thursday 17 November 2005 17:53, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> http://people.redhat.com/dnovillo/rable.pdf

How are the insn annotations and caches you propose different from
what df.c already does?

Gr.
Steven