* compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
@ 2005-11-18 18:52 Douglas B. Jones
2005-11-18 19:34 ` Joe Buck
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Douglas B. Jones @ 2005-11-18 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc; +Cc: Douglas B Jones
(NOTE: I originally posted this to gcc-help, but only got
one response that the sender said they had posted a similar
posting a while back and got no responses. So, I am reposting
the below to gcc in hopes that this might be a better place
to post this question.)
I am on:
SunOS hostname 5.9 Generic_118558-14 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-1500.
I try to do a bootstrap with the following using gnu make 3.80:
mkdir objectdir;cd objectdir
CC="cc -xildoff -xarch=v9"
export CC
../gcc-4.0.2/configure
gmake bootstrap
I get the following errors:
stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/usr/local/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/bin/ -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wold-style-definition -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DGENERATOR_FILE -o
build/genmodes \
build/genmodes.o build/errors.o ../build-sparc-sun-solaris2.9/libiberty/libiberty.a
ld: warning: file ../build-sparc-sun-solaris2.9/libiberty/libiberty.a(hashtab.o): wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
htab_create_alloc build/genmodes.o
htab_find build/genmodes.o
xcalloc build/genmodes.o
htab_hash_string build/genmodes.o
htab_find_slot build/genmodes.o
xmalloc build/genmodes.o
xstrdup build/genmodes.o
ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to build/genmodes
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [build/genmodes] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/export/home/src/net/gnu/odir/gcc'
make[1]: *** [stage2_build] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/export/home/src/net/gnu/odir/gcc'
make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2
I am new to the sun environment, so any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
2005-11-18 18:52 compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9 Douglas B. Jones
@ 2005-11-18 19:34 ` Joe Buck
2005-11-18 20:12 ` Eric Botcazou
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Joe Buck @ 2005-11-18 19:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Douglas B. Jones; +Cc: gcc
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 01:48:57PM -0500, Douglas B. Jones wrote:
> I am on:
>
> SunOS hostname 5.9 Generic_118558-14 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-1500.
> I try to do a bootstrap with the following using gnu make 3.80:
>
> mkdir objectdir;cd objectdir
> CC="cc -xildoff -xarch=v9"
> export CC
Why are you choosing those flags?
> ../gcc-4.0.2/configure
> gmake bootstrap
>
> I get the following errors:
>
> stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/usr/local/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/bin/ -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes
> -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wold-style-definition -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DGENERATOR_FILE -o
> build/genmodes \
> build/genmodes.o build/errors.o ../build-sparc-sun-solaris2.9/libiberty/libiberty.a
> ld: warning: file ../build-sparc-sun-solaris2.9/libiberty/libiberty.a(hashtab.o): wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64
Just do CC=cc, you will get both a 32-bit and a 64-bit compiler. What
seems to be happening is that the build process assumes that the first
libiberty you get (the one built with the native compiler) is 32-bit code.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
2005-11-18 19:34 ` Joe Buck
@ 2005-11-18 20:12 ` Eric Botcazou
2005-11-18 20:24 ` Joe Buck
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Eric Botcazou @ 2005-11-18 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joe Buck; +Cc: gcc, Douglas B. Jones
> > mkdir objectdir;cd objectdir
> > CC="cc -xildoff -xarch=v9"
> > export CC
>
> Why are you choosing those flags?
Probably because they are advertised on:
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#sparc64-x-solaris2
> Just do CC=cc, you will get both a 32-bit and a 64-bit compiler. What
> seems to be happening is that the build process assumes that the first
> libiberty you get (the one built with the native compiler) is 32-bit code.
Douglas has simply mixed 32-bit and 64-bit configuration.
For the 32-bit compiler (sparc-sun-solaris2.9), CC=cc is fine.
For the 64-bit compiler (sparc64-sun-solaris2.9), CC="cc -xarch=v9" is fine.
--
Eric Botcazou
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
2005-11-18 20:12 ` Eric Botcazou
@ 2005-11-18 20:24 ` Joe Buck
2005-11-18 20:31 ` Eric Botcazou
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Joe Buck @ 2005-11-18 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Botcazou; +Cc: gcc, Douglas B. Jones
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 09:17:11PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > > mkdir objectdir;cd objectdir
> > > CC="cc -xildoff -xarch=v9"
> > > export CC
> >
> > Why are you choosing those flags?
>
> Probably because they are advertised on:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#sparc64-x-solaris2
>
> > Just do CC=cc, you will get both a 32-bit and a 64-bit compiler. What
> > seems to be happening is that the build process assumes that the first
> > libiberty you get (the one built with the native compiler) is 32-bit code.
>
> Douglas has simply mixed 32-bit and 64-bit configuration.
>
> For the 32-bit compiler (sparc-sun-solaris2.9), CC=cc is fine.
> For the 64-bit compiler (sparc64-sun-solaris2.9), CC="cc -xarch=v9" is fine.
This seems error-prone; maybe more warnings need to be added to the
installation note.
Also, sparc-sun-solaris2.9 doesn't mean "32-bit compiler", it means
"build both compilers, defaulting to 32 bits".
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
2005-11-18 20:24 ` Joe Buck
@ 2005-11-18 20:31 ` Eric Botcazou
2005-11-18 22:50 ` Joe Buck
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Eric Botcazou @ 2005-11-18 20:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joe Buck; +Cc: gcc, Douglas B. Jones
> Also, sparc-sun-solaris2.9 doesn't mean "32-bit compiler", it means
> "build both compilers, defaulting to 32 bits".
No, the compiler is purely 32-bit, only the libraries are of both flavors.
--
Eric Botcazou
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
2005-11-18 20:31 ` Eric Botcazou
@ 2005-11-18 22:50 ` Joe Buck
2005-11-18 23:01 ` Eric Botcazou
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Joe Buck @ 2005-11-18 22:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Botcazou; +Cc: gcc, Douglas B. Jones
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 09:35:28PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > Also, sparc-sun-solaris2.9 doesn't mean "32-bit compiler", it means
> > "build both compilers, defaulting to 32 bits".
>
> No, the compiler is purely 32-bit, only the libraries are of both flavors.
We are using the term in a differnent way, it appears.
Although the compiler's executable is composed of 32-bit code, it can
generate 32 or 64 bit code, which is what I meant by "both compilers".
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
2005-11-18 22:50 ` Joe Buck
@ 2005-11-18 23:01 ` Eric Botcazou
2005-11-21 21:05 ` Douglas B. Jones
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Eric Botcazou @ 2005-11-18 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joe Buck; +Cc: gcc, Douglas B. Jones
> Although the compiler's executable is composed of 32-bit code, it can
> generate 32 or 64 bit code, which is what I meant by "both compilers".
Ah! Indeed, but you're going to further confuse the readers. :-)
I think the best terminology is "32-bit multilib compiler" for
sparc-sun-solaris and "64-bit multilib compiler" for sparc64-sun-solaris.
--
Eric Botcazou
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* RE: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
2005-11-18 23:01 ` Eric Botcazou
@ 2005-11-21 21:05 ` Douglas B. Jones
2005-11-21 21:21 ` Eric Botcazou
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Douglas B. Jones @ 2005-11-21 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc; +Cc: 'Douglas B. Jones'
Thanks to everyone for the information below. I have change the
CC to cc only. So, now the script is:
CC=cc
export CC
../gcc-4.0.2/configure
gmake bootstrap
and I get the errors:
checking for sparc-sun-solaris2.9-gcc... no
checking for gcc... no
checking for sparc-sun-solaris2.9-cc... no
checking for cc... cc
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... no
checking whether cc accepts -g... yes
checking for cc option to accept ANSI C... none needed
checking how to run the C preprocessor... cc -E
checking whether cc understands -c and -o together... yes
checking for an ANSI C-conforming const... yes
checking for inline... inline
checking whether byte ordering is bigendian... cross-compiling...
unknown
checking to probe for byte ordering... cc: Warning: option -2 passed to ld
"conftest.c", line 4: warning: initializer does not fit or is out of range: 35283
"conftest.c", line 4: warning: initializer does not fit or is out of range: 58339
"conftest.c", line 4: warning: initializer does not fit or is out of range: 34195
"conftest.c", line 4: warning: initializer does not fit or is out of range: 38341
"conftest.c", line 4: warning: initializer does not fit or is out of range: 35268
"conftest.c", line 4: warning: initializer does not fit or is out of range: 38273
"conftest.c", line 5: warning: initializer does not fit or is out of range: 49865
"conftest.c", line 5: warning: initializer does not fit or is out of range: 51077
"conftest.c", line 5: warning: initializer does not fit or is out of range: 38340
"conftest.c", line 5: warning: initializer does not fit or is out of range: 35201
"conftest.c", line 5: warning: initializer does not fit or is out of range: 38370
"conftest.c", line 5: warning: initializer does not fit or is out of range: 43234
guessing bigendian ...
unknown
configure: error: unknown endianess - sorry, please pre-set ac_cv_c_bigendian
make[1]: *** [configure-target-libiberty] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/export/home/src/net/gnu/odir'
make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2
This is all somewhat after the line of "Comparing stage2 and stage3 of the compiler".
Also, the ask why I was using the flags I was. The only reference I found to sparc
where the sparcv9-*-solaris2* which sent me to sparc64-*-solaris2* on install/specific.
html. Should I have been looking somewhere else?
Thanks everyone for the help you have given to one who is not too familiar with
compiler work. Thanks!
-----Original Message-----
From: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Eric Botcazou
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 6:06 PM
To: Joe Buck
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Douglas B. Jones
Subject: Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
> Although the compiler's executable is composed of 32-bit code, it can
> generate 32 or 64 bit code, which is what I meant by "both compilers".
Ah! Indeed, but you're going to further confuse the readers. :-)
I think the best terminology is "32-bit multilib compiler" for
sparc-sun-solaris and "64-bit multilib compiler" for sparc64-sun-solaris.
--
Eric Botcazou
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
2005-11-21 21:05 ` Douglas B. Jones
@ 2005-11-21 21:21 ` Eric Botcazou
2005-11-22 15:56 ` Douglas B. Jones
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Eric Botcazou @ 2005-11-21 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: douglas; +Cc: gcc
> CC to cc only. So, now the script is:
>
> CC=cc
> export CC
> ../gcc-4.0.2/configure
> gmake bootstrap
Do not export CC and do not use a relative path:
CC=cc $absolute_path/configure ...
> Also, the ask why I was using the flags I was. The only reference I found
> to sparc where the sparcv9-*-solaris2* which sent me to sparc64-*-solaris2*
> on install/specific. html. Should I have been looking somewhere else?
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#sparc-sun-solaris2
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#sparc-sun-solaris27
--
Eric Botcazou
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* RE: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
2005-11-21 21:21 ` Eric Botcazou
@ 2005-11-22 15:56 ` Douglas B. Jones
2005-11-22 17:37 ` Eric Botcazou
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Douglas B. Jones @ 2005-11-22 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
Ok, here is my script (note I am in a directory with only the
script below when I execute the script below):
CC=cc /export/home/src/net/gnu/gcc-4.0.2/configure
gmake bootstrap>make_err 2>&1
I get the exact same errors (at least as far as I see).
Also, I had actually looked at the two links below (for Solaris), but
they appeared to be more from earlier than Solaris 9 and for the most
part for earlier versions of the compiler (3.x series).
Once again, I appreciate all the help you all give! Thanks!
-----Original Message-----
From: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Eric Botcazou
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 4:25 PM
To: douglas@gpc.edu
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
> CC to cc only. So, now the script is:
>
> CC=cc
> export CC
> ../gcc-4.0.2/configure
> gmake bootstrap
Do not export CC and do not use a relative path:
CC=cc $absolute_path/configure ...
> Also, the ask why I was using the flags I was. The only reference I found
> to sparc where the sparcv9-*-solaris2* which sent me to sparc64-*-solaris2*
> on install/specific. html. Should I have been looking somewhere else?
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#sparc-sun-solaris2
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#sparc-sun-solaris27
--
Eric Botcazou
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
2005-11-22 15:56 ` Douglas B. Jones
@ 2005-11-22 17:37 ` Eric Botcazou
2005-11-22 17:49 ` Douglas B. Jones
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Eric Botcazou @ 2005-11-22 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: douglas; +Cc: gcc
> Ok, here is my script (note I am in a directory with only the
> script below when I execute the script below):
>
> CC=cc /export/home/src/net/gnu/gcc-4.0.2/configure
> gmake bootstrap>make_err 2>&1
>
> I get the exact same errors (at least as far as I see).
The target libiberty is not supposed to be built with the bootstrap compiler.
Please verify that CC is not set in your environment.
--
Eric Botcazou
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* RE: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
2005-11-22 17:37 ` Eric Botcazou
@ 2005-11-22 17:49 ` Douglas B. Jones
2005-11-22 18:20 ` Eric Botcazou
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Douglas B. Jones @ 2005-11-22 17:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
I put:
printenv CC
echo $CC
which cc
in the script and only got output for the which cmd as /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc.
I even reran the script with CC not set, just to make sure. Thanks!
-----Original Message-----
From: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Eric Botcazou
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 12:42 PM
To: douglas@gpc.edu
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
> Ok, here is my script (note I am in a directory with only the
> script below when I execute the script below):
>
> CC=cc /export/home/src/net/gnu/gcc-4.0.2/configure
> gmake bootstrap>make_err 2>&1
>
> I get the exact same errors (at least as far as I see).
The target libiberty is not supposed to be built with the bootstrap compiler.
Please verify that CC is not set in your environment.
--
Eric Botcazou
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
2005-11-22 17:49 ` Douglas B. Jones
@ 2005-11-22 18:20 ` Eric Botcazou
2005-11-22 18:34 ` Douglas B. Jones
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Eric Botcazou @ 2005-11-22 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: douglas; +Cc: gcc
> I put:
>
> printenv CC
> echo $CC
> which cc
>
> in the script and only got output for the which cmd as
> /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc. I even reran the script with CC not set, just to make
> sure. Thanks!
Hum... let's try the basic checks then:
- what is your configure shell?
- what is your version of GNU make?
--
Eric Botcazou
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* RE: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
2005-11-22 18:20 ` Eric Botcazou
@ 2005-11-22 18:34 ` Douglas B. Jones
2005-11-22 19:48 ` Douglas B. Jones
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Douglas B. Jones @ 2005-11-22 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
configure shell: /bin/sh
gnu make: GNU Make 3.80
Although I had #!/bin/sh at the beginning, it was taking my
SHELL as tcsh. I have stuck in (via notes) SHELL=/bin/ksh;export SHELL
and I am rebuilding it right now. Thanks!
-----Original Message-----
From: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Eric Botcazou
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 1:25 PM
To: douglas@gpc.edu
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
> I put:
>
> printenv CC
> echo $CC
> which cc
>
> in the script and only got output for the which cmd as
> /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc. I even reran the script with CC not set, just to make
> sure. Thanks!
Hum... let's try the basic checks then:
- what is your configure shell?
- what is your version of GNU make?
--
Eric Botcazou
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* RE: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
2005-11-22 18:34 ` Douglas B. Jones
@ 2005-11-22 19:48 ` Douglas B. Jones
2005-11-22 19:55 ` Eric Botcazou
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Douglas B. Jones @ 2005-11-22 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
Ok, just recompiled with the shell as /bin/ksh and CC not defined
and got the same errors as last time? Thanks!
-----Original Message-----
From: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Douglas B. Jones
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 1:36 PM
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
configure shell: /bin/sh
gnu make: GNU Make 3.80
Although I had #!/bin/sh at the beginning, it was taking my
SHELL as tcsh. I have stuck in (via notes) SHELL=/bin/ksh;export SHELL
and I am rebuilding it right now. Thanks!
-----Original Message-----
From: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Eric Botcazou
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 1:25 PM
To: douglas@gpc.edu
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
> I put:
>
> printenv CC
> echo $CC
> which cc
>
> in the script and only got output for the which cmd as
> /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc. I even reran the script with CC not set, just to make
> sure. Thanks!
Hum... let's try the basic checks then:
- what is your configure shell?
- what is your version of GNU make?
--
Eric Botcazou
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
2005-11-22 19:48 ` Douglas B. Jones
@ 2005-11-22 19:55 ` Eric Botcazou
2005-11-22 19:58 ` Douglas B. Jones
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Eric Botcazou @ 2005-11-22 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: douglas; +Cc: gcc
> Although I had #!/bin/sh at the beginning, it was taking my
> SHELL as tcsh. I have stuck in (via notes) SHELL=/bin/ksh;export SHELL
> and I am rebuilding it right now. Thanks!
Could you post the config.log file of the target libiberty?
--
Eric Botcazou
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* RE: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
2005-11-22 19:55 ` Eric Botcazou
@ 2005-11-22 19:58 ` Douglas B. Jones
2005-11-22 20:17 ` Eric Botcazou
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Douglas B. Jones @ 2005-11-22 19:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
It is 4325 lines, should I just email it to you instead
of the whole group? Thanks!
-----Original Message-----
From: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Eric Botcazou
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 3:00 PM
To: douglas@gpc.edu
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
> Although I had #!/bin/sh at the beginning, it was taking my
> SHELL as tcsh. I have stuck in (via notes) SHELL=/bin/ksh;export SHELL
> and I am rebuilding it right now. Thanks!
Could you post the config.log file of the target libiberty?
--
Eric Botcazou
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
2005-11-22 19:58 ` Douglas B. Jones
@ 2005-11-22 20:17 ` Eric Botcazou
2005-11-22 20:20 ` Douglas B. Jones
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Eric Botcazou @ 2005-11-22 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: douglas; +Cc: gcc
> It is 4325 lines, should I just email it to you instead
> of the whole group?
Yes, compressed.
--
Eric Botcazou
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* RE: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
2005-11-22 20:17 ` Eric Botcazou
@ 2005-11-22 20:20 ` Douglas B. Jones
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Douglas B. Jones @ 2005-11-22 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
On its' way. Thanks!
-----Original Message-----
From: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Eric Botcazou
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 3:22 PM
To: douglas@gpc.edu
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
> It is 4325 lines, should I just email it to you instead
> of the whole group?
Yes, compressed.
--
Eric Botcazou
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-11-22 20:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-11-18 18:52 compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9 Douglas B. Jones
2005-11-18 19:34 ` Joe Buck
2005-11-18 20:12 ` Eric Botcazou
2005-11-18 20:24 ` Joe Buck
2005-11-18 20:31 ` Eric Botcazou
2005-11-18 22:50 ` Joe Buck
2005-11-18 23:01 ` Eric Botcazou
2005-11-21 21:05 ` Douglas B. Jones
2005-11-21 21:21 ` Eric Botcazou
2005-11-22 15:56 ` Douglas B. Jones
2005-11-22 17:37 ` Eric Botcazou
2005-11-22 17:49 ` Douglas B. Jones
2005-11-22 18:20 ` Eric Botcazou
2005-11-22 18:34 ` Douglas B. Jones
2005-11-22 19:48 ` Douglas B. Jones
2005-11-22 19:55 ` Eric Botcazou
2005-11-22 19:58 ` Douglas B. Jones
2005-11-22 20:17 ` Eric Botcazou
2005-11-22 20:20 ` Douglas B. Jones
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).