public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
@ 2005-11-18 18:52 Douglas B. Jones
  2005-11-18 19:34 ` Joe Buck
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Douglas B. Jones @ 2005-11-18 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc; +Cc: Douglas B Jones


(NOTE: I originally posted this to gcc-help, but only got
one response that the sender said they had posted a similar
posting a while back and got no responses. So, I am reposting
the below to gcc in hopes that this might be a better place
to post this question.)

I am on:

SunOS hostname 5.9 Generic_118558-14 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-1500.
I try to do a bootstrap with the following using gnu make 3.80:

mkdir objectdir;cd objectdir
CC="cc -xildoff -xarch=v9"
export CC
../gcc-4.0.2/configure
gmake bootstrap

I get the following errors:

stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/usr/local/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/bin/   -g -O2 -DIN_GCC   -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wold-style-definition     -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DGENERATOR_FILE  -o
build/genmodes \
 build/genmodes.o build/errors.o ../build-sparc-sun-solaris2.9/libiberty/libiberty.a
ld: warning: file ../build-sparc-sun-solaris2.9/libiberty/libiberty.a(hashtab.o): wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64
Undefined                       first referenced
 symbol                             in file
htab_create_alloc                   build/genmodes.o
htab_find                           build/genmodes.o
xcalloc                             build/genmodes.o
htab_hash_string                    build/genmodes.o
htab_find_slot                      build/genmodes.o
xmalloc                             build/genmodes.o
xstrdup                             build/genmodes.o
ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to build/genmodes
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [build/genmodes] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/export/home/src/net/gnu/odir/gcc'
make[1]: *** [stage2_build] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/export/home/src/net/gnu/odir/gcc'
make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2

I am new to the sun environment, so any help would be appreciated. Thanks!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
  2005-11-18 18:52 compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9 Douglas B. Jones
@ 2005-11-18 19:34 ` Joe Buck
  2005-11-18 20:12   ` Eric Botcazou
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Joe Buck @ 2005-11-18 19:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Douglas B. Jones; +Cc: gcc

On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 01:48:57PM -0500, Douglas B. Jones wrote:
> I am on:
> 
> SunOS hostname 5.9 Generic_118558-14 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-1500.
> I try to do a bootstrap with the following using gnu make 3.80:
> 
> mkdir objectdir;cd objectdir
> CC="cc -xildoff -xarch=v9"
> export CC

Why are you choosing those flags?

> ../gcc-4.0.2/configure
> gmake bootstrap
> 
> I get the following errors:
> 
> stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/usr/local/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/bin/   -g -O2 -DIN_GCC   -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes
> -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wold-style-definition     -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DGENERATOR_FILE  -o
> build/genmodes \
>  build/genmodes.o build/errors.o ../build-sparc-sun-solaris2.9/libiberty/libiberty.a
> ld: warning: file ../build-sparc-sun-solaris2.9/libiberty/libiberty.a(hashtab.o): wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64

Just do CC=cc, you will get both a 32-bit and a 64-bit compiler.  What
seems to be happening is that the build process assumes that the first
libiberty you get (the one built with the native compiler) is 32-bit code.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
  2005-11-18 19:34 ` Joe Buck
@ 2005-11-18 20:12   ` Eric Botcazou
  2005-11-18 20:24     ` Joe Buck
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Eric Botcazou @ 2005-11-18 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joe Buck; +Cc: gcc, Douglas B. Jones

> > mkdir objectdir;cd objectdir
> > CC="cc -xildoff -xarch=v9"
> > export CC
>
> Why are you choosing those flags?

Probably because they are advertised on:
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#sparc64-x-solaris2

> Just do CC=cc, you will get both a 32-bit and a 64-bit compiler.  What
> seems to be happening is that the build process assumes that the first
> libiberty you get (the one built with the native compiler) is 32-bit code.

Douglas has simply mixed 32-bit and 64-bit configuration.

For the 32-bit compiler (sparc-sun-solaris2.9), CC=cc is fine.
For the 64-bit compiler (sparc64-sun-solaris2.9), CC="cc -xarch=v9" is fine.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
  2005-11-18 20:12   ` Eric Botcazou
@ 2005-11-18 20:24     ` Joe Buck
  2005-11-18 20:31       ` Eric Botcazou
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Joe Buck @ 2005-11-18 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eric Botcazou; +Cc: gcc, Douglas B. Jones

On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 09:17:11PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > > mkdir objectdir;cd objectdir
> > > CC="cc -xildoff -xarch=v9"
> > > export CC
> >
> > Why are you choosing those flags?
> 
> Probably because they are advertised on:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#sparc64-x-solaris2
> 
> > Just do CC=cc, you will get both a 32-bit and a 64-bit compiler.  What
> > seems to be happening is that the build process assumes that the first
> > libiberty you get (the one built with the native compiler) is 32-bit code.
> 
> Douglas has simply mixed 32-bit and 64-bit configuration.
> 
> For the 32-bit compiler (sparc-sun-solaris2.9), CC=cc is fine.
> For the 64-bit compiler (sparc64-sun-solaris2.9), CC="cc -xarch=v9" is fine.

This seems error-prone; maybe more warnings need to be added to the
installation note.

Also, sparc-sun-solaris2.9 doesn't mean "32-bit compiler", it means
"build both compilers, defaulting to 32 bits".

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
  2005-11-18 20:24     ` Joe Buck
@ 2005-11-18 20:31       ` Eric Botcazou
  2005-11-18 22:50         ` Joe Buck
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Eric Botcazou @ 2005-11-18 20:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joe Buck; +Cc: gcc, Douglas B. Jones

> Also, sparc-sun-solaris2.9 doesn't mean "32-bit compiler", it means
> "build both compilers, defaulting to 32 bits".

No, the compiler is purely 32-bit, only the libraries are of both flavors.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
  2005-11-18 20:31       ` Eric Botcazou
@ 2005-11-18 22:50         ` Joe Buck
  2005-11-18 23:01           ` Eric Botcazou
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Joe Buck @ 2005-11-18 22:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eric Botcazou; +Cc: gcc, Douglas B. Jones

On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 09:35:28PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > Also, sparc-sun-solaris2.9 doesn't mean "32-bit compiler", it means
> > "build both compilers, defaulting to 32 bits".
> 
> No, the compiler is purely 32-bit, only the libraries are of both flavors.

We are using the term in a differnent way, it appears.

Although the compiler's executable is composed of 32-bit code, it can
generate 32 or 64 bit code, which is what I meant by "both compilers".

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
  2005-11-18 22:50         ` Joe Buck
@ 2005-11-18 23:01           ` Eric Botcazou
  2005-11-21 21:05             ` Douglas B. Jones
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Eric Botcazou @ 2005-11-18 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joe Buck; +Cc: gcc, Douglas B. Jones

> Although the compiler's executable is composed of 32-bit code, it can
> generate 32 or 64 bit code, which is what I meant by "both compilers".

Ah!  Indeed, but you're going to further confuse the readers. :-)

I think the best terminology is "32-bit multilib compiler" for 
sparc-sun-solaris and "64-bit multilib compiler" for sparc64-sun-solaris.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* RE: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
  2005-11-18 23:01           ` Eric Botcazou
@ 2005-11-21 21:05             ` Douglas B. Jones
  2005-11-21 21:21               ` Eric Botcazou
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Douglas B. Jones @ 2005-11-21 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc; +Cc: 'Douglas B. Jones'

 
Thanks to everyone for the information below. I have change the
CC to cc only. So, now the script is:

CC=cc
export CC
../gcc-4.0.2/configure
gmake bootstrap

and I get the errors:

checking for sparc-sun-solaris2.9-gcc... no
checking for gcc... no
checking for sparc-sun-solaris2.9-cc... no
checking for cc... cc
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... no
checking whether cc accepts -g... yes
checking for cc option to accept ANSI C... none needed
checking how to run the C preprocessor... cc -E
checking whether cc understands -c and -o together... yes
checking for an ANSI C-conforming const... yes
checking for inline... inline
checking whether byte ordering is bigendian... cross-compiling... 
unknown
checking to probe for byte ordering... cc: Warning: option -2 passed to ld
"conftest.c", line 4: warning: initializer does not fit or is out of range: 35283
"conftest.c", line 4: warning: initializer does not fit or is out of range: 58339
"conftest.c", line 4: warning: initializer does not fit or is out of range: 34195
"conftest.c", line 4: warning: initializer does not fit or is out of range: 38341
"conftest.c", line 4: warning: initializer does not fit or is out of range: 35268
"conftest.c", line 4: warning: initializer does not fit or is out of range: 38273
"conftest.c", line 5: warning: initializer does not fit or is out of range: 49865
"conftest.c", line 5: warning: initializer does not fit or is out of range: 51077
"conftest.c", line 5: warning: initializer does not fit or is out of range: 38340
"conftest.c", line 5: warning: initializer does not fit or is out of range: 35201
"conftest.c", line 5: warning: initializer does not fit or is out of range: 38370
"conftest.c", line 5: warning: initializer does not fit or is out of range: 43234
guessing bigendian ...  
unknown
configure: error: unknown endianess - sorry, please pre-set ac_cv_c_bigendian
make[1]: *** [configure-target-libiberty] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/export/home/src/net/gnu/odir'
make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2


This is all somewhat after the line of "Comparing stage2 and stage3 of the compiler".

Also, the ask why I was using the flags I was. The only reference I found to sparc
where the sparcv9-*-solaris2* which sent me to sparc64-*-solaris2* on install/specific.
html. Should I have been looking somewhere else?

Thanks everyone for the help you have given to one who is not too familiar with
compiler work. Thanks!


-----Original Message-----
From: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Eric Botcazou
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 6:06 PM
To: Joe Buck
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Douglas B. Jones
Subject: Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9

> Although the compiler's executable is composed of 32-bit code, it can
> generate 32 or 64 bit code, which is what I meant by "both compilers".

Ah!  Indeed, but you're going to further confuse the readers. :-)

I think the best terminology is "32-bit multilib compiler" for 
sparc-sun-solaris and "64-bit multilib compiler" for sparc64-sun-solaris.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
  2005-11-21 21:05             ` Douglas B. Jones
@ 2005-11-21 21:21               ` Eric Botcazou
  2005-11-22 15:56                 ` Douglas B. Jones
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Eric Botcazou @ 2005-11-21 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: douglas; +Cc: gcc

> CC to cc only. So, now the script is:
>
> CC=cc
> export CC
> ../gcc-4.0.2/configure
> gmake bootstrap

Do not export CC and do not use a relative path:
CC=cc $absolute_path/configure ...

> Also, the ask why I was using the flags I was. The only reference I found
> to sparc where the sparcv9-*-solaris2* which sent me to sparc64-*-solaris2*
> on install/specific. html. Should I have been looking somewhere else?

http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#sparc-sun-solaris2
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#sparc-sun-solaris27

-- 
Eric Botcazou

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* RE: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
  2005-11-21 21:21               ` Eric Botcazou
@ 2005-11-22 15:56                 ` Douglas B. Jones
  2005-11-22 17:37                   ` Eric Botcazou
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Douglas B. Jones @ 2005-11-22 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc


Ok, here is my script (note I am in a directory with only the
script below when I execute the script below):

CC=cc /export/home/src/net/gnu/gcc-4.0.2/configure
gmake bootstrap>make_err 2>&1

I get the exact same errors (at least as far as I see).

Also, I had actually looked at the two links below (for Solaris), but
they appeared to be more from earlier than Solaris 9 and for the most
part for earlier versions of the compiler (3.x series).

Once again, I appreciate all the help you all give! Thanks!

-----Original Message-----
From: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Eric Botcazou
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 4:25 PM
To: douglas@gpc.edu
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9

> CC to cc only. So, now the script is:
>
> CC=cc
> export CC
> ../gcc-4.0.2/configure
> gmake bootstrap

Do not export CC and do not use a relative path:
CC=cc $absolute_path/configure ...

> Also, the ask why I was using the flags I was. The only reference I found
> to sparc where the sparcv9-*-solaris2* which sent me to sparc64-*-solaris2*
> on install/specific. html. Should I have been looking somewhere else?

http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#sparc-sun-solaris2
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#sparc-sun-solaris27

-- 
Eric Botcazou

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
  2005-11-22 15:56                 ` Douglas B. Jones
@ 2005-11-22 17:37                   ` Eric Botcazou
  2005-11-22 17:49                     ` Douglas B. Jones
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Eric Botcazou @ 2005-11-22 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: douglas; +Cc: gcc

> Ok, here is my script (note I am in a directory with only the
> script below when I execute the script below):
>
> CC=cc /export/home/src/net/gnu/gcc-4.0.2/configure
> gmake bootstrap>make_err 2>&1
>
> I get the exact same errors (at least as far as I see).

The target libiberty is not supposed to be built with the bootstrap compiler.
Please verify that CC is not set in your environment.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* RE: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
  2005-11-22 17:37                   ` Eric Botcazou
@ 2005-11-22 17:49                     ` Douglas B. Jones
  2005-11-22 18:20                       ` Eric Botcazou
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Douglas B. Jones @ 2005-11-22 17:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc


I put:

printenv CC
echo $CC
which cc

in the script and only got output for the which cmd as /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc.
I even reran the script with CC not set, just to make sure. Thanks!

-----Original Message-----
From: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Eric Botcazou
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 12:42 PM
To: douglas@gpc.edu
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9

> Ok, here is my script (note I am in a directory with only the
> script below when I execute the script below):
>
> CC=cc /export/home/src/net/gnu/gcc-4.0.2/configure
> gmake bootstrap>make_err 2>&1
>
> I get the exact same errors (at least as far as I see).

The target libiberty is not supposed to be built with the bootstrap compiler.
Please verify that CC is not set in your environment.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
  2005-11-22 17:49                     ` Douglas B. Jones
@ 2005-11-22 18:20                       ` Eric Botcazou
  2005-11-22 18:34                         ` Douglas B. Jones
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Eric Botcazou @ 2005-11-22 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: douglas; +Cc: gcc

> I put:
>
> printenv CC
> echo $CC
> which cc
>
> in the script and only got output for the which cmd as
> /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc. I even reran the script with CC not set, just to make
> sure. Thanks!

Hum... let's try the basic checks then:
- what is your configure shell?
- what is your version of GNU make?

-- 
Eric Botcazou

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* RE: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
  2005-11-22 18:20                       ` Eric Botcazou
@ 2005-11-22 18:34                         ` Douglas B. Jones
  2005-11-22 19:48                           ` Douglas B. Jones
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Douglas B. Jones @ 2005-11-22 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc


configure shell: /bin/sh
gnu make: GNU Make 3.80

Although I had #!/bin/sh at the beginning, it was taking my
SHELL as tcsh. I have stuck in (via notes) SHELL=/bin/ksh;export SHELL
and I am rebuilding it right now. Thanks! 

-----Original Message-----
From: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Eric Botcazou
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 1:25 PM
To: douglas@gpc.edu
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9

> I put:
>
> printenv CC
> echo $CC
> which cc
>
> in the script and only got output for the which cmd as
> /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc. I even reran the script with CC not set, just to make
> sure. Thanks!

Hum... let's try the basic checks then:
- what is your configure shell?
- what is your version of GNU make?

-- 
Eric Botcazou

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* RE: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
  2005-11-22 18:34                         ` Douglas B. Jones
@ 2005-11-22 19:48                           ` Douglas B. Jones
  2005-11-22 19:55                             ` Eric Botcazou
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Douglas B. Jones @ 2005-11-22 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc


Ok, just recompiled with the shell as /bin/ksh and CC not defined
and got the same errors as last time? Thanks! 

-----Original Message-----
From: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Douglas B. Jones
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 1:36 PM
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9


configure shell: /bin/sh
gnu make: GNU Make 3.80

Although I had #!/bin/sh at the beginning, it was taking my
SHELL as tcsh. I have stuck in (via notes) SHELL=/bin/ksh;export SHELL
and I am rebuilding it right now. Thanks! 

-----Original Message-----
From: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Eric Botcazou
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 1:25 PM
To: douglas@gpc.edu
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9

> I put:
>
> printenv CC
> echo $CC
> which cc
>
> in the script and only got output for the which cmd as
> /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc. I even reran the script with CC not set, just to make
> sure. Thanks!

Hum... let's try the basic checks then:
- what is your configure shell?
- what is your version of GNU make?

-- 
Eric Botcazou

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
  2005-11-22 19:48                           ` Douglas B. Jones
@ 2005-11-22 19:55                             ` Eric Botcazou
  2005-11-22 19:58                               ` Douglas B. Jones
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Eric Botcazou @ 2005-11-22 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: douglas; +Cc: gcc

> Although I had #!/bin/sh at the beginning, it was taking my
> SHELL as tcsh. I have stuck in (via notes) SHELL=/bin/ksh;export SHELL
> and I am rebuilding it right now. Thanks!

Could you post the config.log file of the target libiberty?

-- 
Eric Botcazou

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* RE: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
  2005-11-22 19:55                             ` Eric Botcazou
@ 2005-11-22 19:58                               ` Douglas B. Jones
  2005-11-22 20:17                                 ` Eric Botcazou
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Douglas B. Jones @ 2005-11-22 19:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc


It is 4325 lines, should I just email it to you instead
of the whole group? Thanks!

-----Original Message-----
From: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Eric Botcazou
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 3:00 PM
To: douglas@gpc.edu
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9

> Although I had #!/bin/sh at the beginning, it was taking my
> SHELL as tcsh. I have stuck in (via notes) SHELL=/bin/ksh;export SHELL
> and I am rebuilding it right now. Thanks!

Could you post the config.log file of the target libiberty?

-- 
Eric Botcazou

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
  2005-11-22 19:58                               ` Douglas B. Jones
@ 2005-11-22 20:17                                 ` Eric Botcazou
  2005-11-22 20:20                                   ` Douglas B. Jones
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Eric Botcazou @ 2005-11-22 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: douglas; +Cc: gcc

> It is 4325 lines, should I just email it to you instead
> of the whole group? 

Yes, compressed.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* RE: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
  2005-11-22 20:17                                 ` Eric Botcazou
@ 2005-11-22 20:20                                   ` Douglas B. Jones
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Douglas B. Jones @ 2005-11-22 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc

 
On its' way. Thanks!

-----Original Message-----
From: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Eric Botcazou
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 3:22 PM
To: douglas@gpc.edu
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9

> It is 4325 lines, should I just email it to you instead
> of the whole group? 

Yes, compressed.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-11-22 20:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-11-18 18:52 compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9 Douglas B. Jones
2005-11-18 19:34 ` Joe Buck
2005-11-18 20:12   ` Eric Botcazou
2005-11-18 20:24     ` Joe Buck
2005-11-18 20:31       ` Eric Botcazou
2005-11-18 22:50         ` Joe Buck
2005-11-18 23:01           ` Eric Botcazou
2005-11-21 21:05             ` Douglas B. Jones
2005-11-21 21:21               ` Eric Botcazou
2005-11-22 15:56                 ` Douglas B. Jones
2005-11-22 17:37                   ` Eric Botcazou
2005-11-22 17:49                     ` Douglas B. Jones
2005-11-22 18:20                       ` Eric Botcazou
2005-11-22 18:34                         ` Douglas B. Jones
2005-11-22 19:48                           ` Douglas B. Jones
2005-11-22 19:55                             ` Eric Botcazou
2005-11-22 19:58                               ` Douglas B. Jones
2005-11-22 20:17                                 ` Eric Botcazou
2005-11-22 20:20                                   ` Douglas B. Jones

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).