public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* libffi failures on powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0
@ 2007-04-14 21:09 Dominique Dhumieres
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Dominique Dhumieres @ 2007-04-14 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc

I managed to regtest libffi and got the following summary:

                === libffi tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_longdouble.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test, is 12 7.29112e-304 191 0 1.98612e-309 0: 12 7.29114e-304 191
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct5.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_longdouble.c -O2 output pattern test, is 12 7.29112e-304 143 0 1.98612e-309 0: 12 -1.38837e-231 143
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct5.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_longdouble.c -O3 output pattern test, is 12 7.29112e-304 143 0 1.98612e-309 0: 12 -1.38837e-231 143
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct5.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_longdouble.c -Os output pattern test, is 12 7.29112e-304 143 0 1.98612e-309 0: 12 -1.38837e-231 143
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct5.c -Os execution test

                === libffi Summary ===

# of expected passes            1084
# of unexpected failures        8
# of unsupported tests          8

Is this something expected or is there yet another bug in OSX 10.3.9?

TIA

Dominique

PS These results were obtained after some terrible hack of 
libffi/testsuite/lib/libffi-dg.exp. Is there someone around able
to help me to do a cleaner post-install regtest?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2007-04-14 20:07 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-04-14 21:09 libffi failures on powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0 Dominique Dhumieres

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).