From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22497 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2007 13:22:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 22487 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Nov 2007 13:22:04 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from province.act-europe.fr (HELO province.act-europe.fr) (212.157.227.214) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:22:01 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-province.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73ACC16671B; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:21:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from province.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (province.act-europe.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ddCJwtFnmMgI; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:21:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from cardhu.act-europe.fr (cardhu.act-europe.fr [10.10.0.168]) by province.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41834166718; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:21:59 +0100 (CET) Received: by cardhu.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 546) id 1E7ED1C2; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:21:59 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:43:00 -0000 From: Olivier Hainque To: bonzini@gnu.org Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, berrendo@adacore.com, roche@adacore.com, hainque@adacore.com Subject: Re: structuring a front-end subdirectory Message-ID: <20071119132158.GC7651@cardhu.act-europe.fr> References: <20071109164421.GA24588@cardhu.act-europe.fr> <20071112125938.GA1924@cardhu.act-europe.fr> <47415346.8000306@gnu.org> <20071119121437.GB7651@cardhu.act-europe.fr> <4741814D.3030004@lu.unisi.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4741814D.3030004@lu.unisi.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg00535.txt.bz2 Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > It would seem to me that if everything was moved to libada, this > > would not be necessary anymore. > Sorry, I wanted to write "everything related to the Ada RTS". Oh, I see. > Of course Gigi is not going to be moved into libada. Right :-) And even if "everything related to the Ada RTS" was moved to libada, we believe extracting gigi + gcc build bits out of the rest would still be an improvement of our sources organization. We are suggesting this first (now), because it is a much simpler step to make, we are ready for it, and it would help our maintainership. Olivier