From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7455 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2007 01:46:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 7443 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Dec 2007 01:46:27 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca (HELO caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca) (129.97.134.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 01:46:22 +0000 Received: from caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F1F73CB0 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:46:21 -0500 (EST) Received: by caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Postfix, from userid 20006) id 11CB773CC4; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:46:21 -0500 (EST) To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: A proposal to align GCC stack Message-Id: <20071219014621.11CB773CC4@caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 01:46:00 -0000 From: rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge) Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00549.txt.bz2 Robert Dewar writes: >Well if we have local variables of type float (and we have specified >use of SSE), we are in trouble, no? Non-vector SSE instructions, like the ones that operate on scalar floats, don't require memory operands to be aligned. Ross Ridge