From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4400 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2007 21:27:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 4391 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Dec 2007 21:27:43 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pauline.vellum.cz (HELO pauline.vellum.cz) (89.250.243.234) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 21:27:30 +0000 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pauline.vellum.cz (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id lBMLRRHe028706 for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 22:27:27 +0100 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lBMLRQDC021408; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 22:27:26 +0100 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id lBMLRQ2h021407; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 22:27:26 +0100 Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 22:49:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Andrew Haley Cc: Alexandre Oliva , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Strange error message from gdb Message-ID: <20071222212726.GA21386@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <18281.21294.238761.442229@zebedee.pink> <20071219172943.GA5939@caradoc.them.org> <18281.23234.151870.816362@zebedee.pink> <20071219185517.GA10986@caradoc.them.org> <18281.27225.249982.220171@zebedee.pink> <18282.13956.454306.676164@zebedee.pink> <18282.32042.419094.175944@zebedee.pink> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18282.32042.419094.175944@zebedee.pink> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00664.txt.bz2 On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:33:14 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote: > Alexandre Oliva writes: > > > > How about this patch, instead? It will restore debuggability to Java > > while at the same time maintaining the progress of using the > > long-supported-by-GDB DW_TAG_class_type in both C++ and Java. > > > > for gcc/java/ChangeLog > > from Alexandre Oliva > > > > * lang.c (java_classify_record): Don't return > > RECORD_IS_INTERFACE for now. > > > > OK, thanks. FYI GDB HEAD supports it now (just the backward compatible way, no new info extracted from it so far). http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2007-12/msg00123.html Regards, Jan