From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-143518-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 19258 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2008 12:19:48 -0000
Received: (qmail 19124 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jan 2008 12:19:48 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from matups.math.u-psud.fr (HELO matups.math.u-psud.fr) (129.175.50.4)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:19:27 +0000
Received: from barah.math.u-psud.fr (barah.math.u-psud.fr [129.175.52.24]) 	by matups.math.u-psud.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FFA774B7; 	Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:19:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) 	by barah.math.u-psud.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60ACBD02B8; 	Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:19:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from barah.math.u-psud.fr ([127.0.0.1]) 	by localhost (barah [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP 	id 27799-07; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:19:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ip6-localhost (topodyn-ng.math.u-psud.fr [129.175.50.33]) 	by barah.math.u-psud.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E8ED02F7; 	Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:19:08 +0100 (CET)
From: Duncan Sands <duncan.sands@math.u-psud.fr>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: powercp-linux cross GCC 4.2 vs GCC 4.0.0: -Os code size regression?
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:35:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20071204.744707)
Cc: Sergei Poselenov <sposelenov@emcraft.com>
References: <478DE61D.3060709@emcraft.com> <200801161237.14734.duncan.sands@math.u-psud.fr> <478DF556.2030705@emcraft.com>
In-Reply-To: <478DF556.2030705@emcraft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;   charset="koi8-r"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200801161319.09751.duncan.sands@math.u-psud.fr>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00233.txt.bz2

> LLVM? From what I know llvm-gcc is an alternative for gcc. Are any
> parts of LLVM used in current GCC? None of what I know.

Sorry, I confused my mailing lists and thought you had asked on
the LLVM mailing list.  This explains why I didn't understand
your questions :)

Sorry about the noise,

Duncan.