* LLVM 2.3 Released
@ 2008-06-09 16:10 Chris Lattner
2008-06-09 16:45 ` Jack Howarth
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Lattner @ 2008-06-09 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: GCC Mailing List
Hi all,
For anyone who is interested, we just released LLVM 2.3:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-announce/2008-June/000027.html
http://llvm.org/releases/2.3/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
It has many improvements over the 2.2 release from February, including
better support for gfortran and Ada, better generated code, and lower
compile time among other things. Please see the release notes for
details.
-Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: LLVM 2.3 Released
2008-06-09 16:10 LLVM 2.3 Released Chris Lattner
@ 2008-06-09 16:45 ` Jack Howarth
2008-06-09 16:49 ` Duncan Sands
2008-06-10 5:34 ` Chris Lattner
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jack Howarth @ 2008-06-09 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Lattner; +Cc: gcc
Chris,
Are there any specific plans for moving llvm-gcc from the
gcc 4.2 to the gcc 4.3 code base?
Jack
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 09:09:29AM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For anyone who is interested, we just released LLVM 2.3:
>
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-announce/2008-June/000027.html
> http://llvm.org/releases/2.3/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
>
> It has many improvements over the 2.2 release from February, including
> better support for gfortran and Ada, better generated code, and lower
> compile time among other things. Please see the release notes for details.
>
> -Chris
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: LLVM 2.3 Released
2008-06-09 16:45 ` Jack Howarth
@ 2008-06-09 16:49 ` Duncan Sands
2008-06-10 5:34 ` Chris Lattner
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Duncan Sands @ 2008-06-09 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc; +Cc: Jack Howarth, Chris Lattner
> Are there any specific plans for moving llvm-gcc from the
> gcc 4.2 to the gcc 4.3 code base?
I plan to port llvm-gcc to gcc head, since I'm interested in the
Ada front-end and the Ada support in gcc-4.4 is much better than
in gcc-4.2. However I can't say when this will happen, since I
don't have much time to spend on it.
Best wishes,
Duncan.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: LLVM 2.3 Released
2008-06-09 16:45 ` Jack Howarth
2008-06-09 16:49 ` Duncan Sands
@ 2008-06-10 5:34 ` Chris Lattner
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Lattner @ 2008-06-10 5:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jack Howarth; +Cc: gcc
On Jun 9, 2008, at 9:44 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Chris,
> Are there any specific plans for moving llvm-gcc from the
> gcc 4.2 to the gcc 4.3 code base?
I don't know of any specific plans for this, though several people
have expressed interest. What we need is someone to step forward and
do it. I guess this is the classic "patches welcome" answer :). In
the meantime, llvm-gcc 4.2 is being well supported and is under active
development.
-Chris
>
> Jack
>
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 09:09:29AM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> For anyone who is interested, we just released LLVM 2.3:
>>
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-announce/2008-June/
>> 000027.html
>> http://llvm.org/releases/2.3/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
>>
>> It has many improvements over the 2.2 release from February,
>> including
>> better support for gfortran and Ada, better generated code, and lower
>> compile time among other things. Please see the release notes for
>> details.
>>
>> -Chris
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-06-10 5:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-06-09 16:10 LLVM 2.3 Released Chris Lattner
2008-06-09 16:45 ` Jack Howarth
2008-06-09 16:49 ` Duncan Sands
2008-06-10 5:34 ` Chris Lattner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).