From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25340 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2008 16:20:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 25332 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jul 2008 16:20:26 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from province.act-europe.fr (HELO province.act-europe.fr) (212.99.106.214) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:19:58 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-province.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705EA166AB3; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:19:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from province.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (province.act-europe.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WOyZi4V8lJMZ; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:19:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cardhu.act-europe.fr (cardhu.act-europe.fr [10.10.0.168]) by province.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45EF1166AB2; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:19:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cardhu.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 546) id 373B51C8; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:19:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:21:00 -0000 From: Olivier Hainque To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Cc: hainque@adacore.com Subject: Re: refinements to definition of TREE_READONLY ? Message-ID: <20080711161955.GA18778@cardhu.act-europe.fr> References: <20080711161512.GA24187@cardhu.act-europe.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080711161512.GA24187@cardhu.act-europe.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg00207.txt.bz2 Olivier Hainque wrote: [...] While we're at it, it would be nice to settle similar notions about TREE_CONSTANT. There was an exchange along similar lines at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-08/msg00686.html