From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26635 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2009 12:01:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 26375 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jun 2009 12:01:14 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-fx0-f222.google.com (HELO mail-fx0-f222.google.com) (209.85.220.222) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 12:01:07 +0000 Received: by fxm22 with SMTP id 22so3403502fxm.8 for ; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 05:01:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.55.199 with SMTP id v7mr6609830bkg.141.1244462463635; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 05:01:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from horst.localnet (port-92-204-7-185.dynamic.qsc.de [92.204.7.185]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 28sm3630707fkx.24.2009.06.08.05.00.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 08 Jun 2009 05:00:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Maik Beckmann To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: The C++0x lambda branch Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 12:01:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.4 (Linux/2.6.29-ARCH; KDE/4.2.4; x86_64; ; ) References: <200904272054.26901.kde@mosehansen.dk> In-Reply-To: <200904272054.26901.kde@mosehansen.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200906081401.13799.Beckmann.Maik@googlemail.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00151.txt.bz2 Esben Mose Hansen schrieb am Montag 27 April 2009 um 20:54: > Hi, > > I have very much been looking forward to the including of the lambda part > of C++0x. I have been playing around with the lambda branch of gcc, which > at least superficially works well apart from assorted bugs. > > What can I do to make lambdas part of a future release of gcc? > > Where do I report/track bugs to the lambda branch? > > Or should I contact the maintainer directly? Is there schedule for merging c++0x lambda support into mainline? -- Maik