From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-155121-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13984 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 2009 16:49:37 -0000
Received: (qmail 13976 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Jul 2009 16:49:36 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (212.99.106.210)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:49:27 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 	by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2D329006A; 	Thu,  2 Jul 2009 18:49:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) 	by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) 	with ESMTP id eJn1jsxvdb7b; Thu,  2 Jul 2009 18:49:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from cardhu.act-europe.fr (cardhu.act-europe.fr [10.10.0.168]) 	by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D53D29005C; 	Thu,  2 Jul 2009 18:49:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by cardhu.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 546) 	id 940D54EF; Thu,  2 Jul 2009 18:49:24 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:49:00 -0000
From: Olivier Hainque <hainque@adacore.com>
To: David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, hainque@adacore.com
Subject: Re: BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT vs g++ compat test expectation on aix ?
Message-ID: <20090702164924.GB28857@cardhu.act-europe.fr>
References: <20090629135915.GA1654@cardhu.act-europe.fr> <303e1d290906300722p49fb56f2w87915994935a0b9b@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <303e1d290906300722p49fb56f2w87915994935a0b9b@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00061.txt.bz2

David Edelsohn wrote:
> >        .csect .data[RW],4
> >                        ^^^
> >        .align 6
> >              ^^^
> > a2661:
> >        .space 10240
> 
> The default alignment of CSECTs is 4, but using -fdata-sections should
> place the object in its own CSECT with stricter alignment.

 Humm, it apparently doesn't: I see no difference in the generated
 assembly for t027_y.C.

 Olivier