From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3952 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2009 15:59:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 3887 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Aug 2009 15:59:30 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (212.99.106.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Aug 2009 15:59:22 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A70329001E; Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:59:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dAG6fmzJjsH1; Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:59:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from adijon-256-1-17-214.w81-51.abo.wanadoo.fr (ADijon-256-1-17-214.w81-51.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.51.56.214]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0168729007B; Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:59:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Eric Botcazou To: Richard Earnshaw Subject: Re: Preparing to merge ARM/hard_vfp_branch to trunk Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 16:47:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Kazu Hirata , rth@redhat.com, davem@redhat.com, jakub@redhat.com References: <1249478458.17762.33.camel@e200601-lin.cambridge.arm.com> In-Reply-To: <1249478458.17762.33.camel@e200601-lin.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200908051759.02080.ebotcazou@adacore.com> Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00091.txt.bz2 > I believe that I could legitimately approve that patch myself (it's > pretty trivial and I didn't author it), but I'd prefer to get approval > from one of the SPARC maintainers. Here's your chance: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-04/msg01027.html OK. -- Eric Botcazou