From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32432 invoked by alias); 5 Sep 2009 14:27:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 32422 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Sep 2009 14:27:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (212.99.106.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Sep 2009 14:27:04 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E211290032; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 16:27:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H4jft81DC1UP; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 16:26:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (83-152-231-208.rev.libertysurf.net [83.152.231.208]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B14CC290021; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 16:26:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Eric Botcazou To: Gerald Pfeifer Subject: Re: VTA merge broke i386-apple-darwin bootstrap (a primary platform) Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2009 14:27:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, FX References: <006A08BF-710A-4F30-B6E8-C5611ADBF694@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200909051627.02558.ebotcazou@adacore.com> Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00131.txt.bz2 > Same for i386-unknown-freebsd7.2: > > Comparing stages 2 and 3 > warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs > warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs > warning: gcc/cc1obj-checksum.o differs > Bootstrap comparison failure! > gcc/cfgloopmanip.o differs > gmake[2]: *** [compare] Error 1 > > Would be interesting to see someone build i386-linux (really i386, > not i586 or i686). The i586-linux build fails in exactly the same way (this is PR 41241). -- Eric Botcazou