From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11119 invoked by alias); 8 Sep 2009 13:28:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 11084 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Sep 2009 13:28:39 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (212.99.106.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 13:28:29 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0435129003E; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 15:28:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aCh36gMN36yq; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 15:28:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (88-122-76-186.rev.libertysurf.net [88.122.76.186]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B1C290044; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 15:28:19 +0200 (CEST) From: Eric Botcazou To: Dave Korn Subject: Re: GNAT mysterious "missing stub for subunit" error. Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 13:28:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012) Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Laurent GUERBY References: <4AA5F7F4.1070201@gmail.com> <200909081323.20594.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <4AA64852.9070504@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4AA64852.9070504@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200909081528.09776.ebotcazou@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00163.txt.bz2 > That's what I am doing, kind of, just the other way round. In 4.3.2 I > compiled the existing port and switched it over to ZCX, and it worked well > enough to pass most of the testsuite, including EH. Now I'm changing the > target pairs on top of that and suddenly it's complaining, which is why I'm > confused; I thought that bit was stable. Your .diff contains this + EH_MECHANISM=-gcc so it looks as though the base compiler was SJLJ. -- Eric Botcazou