From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1308 invoked by alias); 26 Oct 2009 22:10:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 1300 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Oct 2009 22:10:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from dair.pair.com (HELO dair.pair.com) (209.68.1.49) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:10:09 +0000 Received: (qmail 50319 invoked by uid 20157); 26 Oct 2009 22:10:06 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 Oct 2009 22:10:06 -0000 Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:27:00 -0000 From: Hans-Peter Nilsson To: Ian Lance Taylor cc: Steven Bosscher , Rafael Espindola , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: -use-linker-plugin passed to ld In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091026180456.Q24016@dair.pair.com> References: <38a0d8450910230802o23e6fcfaga35fa29419dff3b0@mail.gmail.com> <38a0d8450910230845k40317523s42f2b84eafa82e9c@mail.gmail.com> <571f6b510910231135y2e5be00eq2247b3878b7cccbd@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00539.txt.bz2 On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > Steven Bosscher writes: > > I was just wondering why this is not a -f* flag, e.g. -fuse-linker-plugin? > Any opinions on the best user interface for this? The color that spells -fuse-linker-plugin seems better, in line with other options. How it's implemented, especially regarding having to ignore it in middle-end is unimportant wrt. spelling, IMVHO. brgds, H-P