From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9109 invoked by alias); 26 Oct 2009 23:35:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 9097 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Oct 2009 23:35:07 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:35:02 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA01010E87; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:35:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E441086C; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:35:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N2Z5X-0001Qc-Nt; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:34:59 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 06:09:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Hans-Peter Nilsson Cc: Ian Lance Taylor , Steven Bosscher , Rafael Espindola , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: -use-linker-plugin passed to ld Message-ID: <20091026233459.GA5459@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Hans-Peter Nilsson , Ian Lance Taylor , Steven Bosscher , Rafael Espindola , gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <38a0d8450910230802o23e6fcfaga35fa29419dff3b0@mail.gmail.com> <38a0d8450910230845k40317523s42f2b84eafa82e9c@mail.gmail.com> <571f6b510910231135y2e5be00eq2247b3878b7cccbd@mail.gmail.com> <20091026180456.Q24016@dair.pair.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091026180456.Q24016@dair.pair.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00542.txt.bz2 On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 06:10:06PM -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > > Steven Bosscher writes: > > > I was just wondering why this is not a -f* flag, e.g. -fuse-linker-plugin? > > Any opinions on the best user interface for this? > > The color that spells -fuse-linker-plugin seems better, in line > with other options. How it's implemented, especially regarding > having to ignore it in middle-end is unimportant wrt. spelling, > IMVHO. I agree with H-P. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery