From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15081 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2009 07:13:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 15059 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Nov 2009 07:13:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (212.99.106.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:13:18 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065A2290072; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 08:13:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SIAWRYVZoWbc; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 08:13:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (83-153-81-66.rev.libertysurf.net [83.153.81.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630E4290032; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 08:13:10 +0100 (CET) From: Eric Botcazou To: Basile STARYNKEVITCH Subject: Re: is LTO aimed for large programs? Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:13:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012) Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Robert Dewar References: <4AF74E2A.2030703@starynkevitch.net> <4AF754C2.90508@adacore.com> <4AF7BA09.3030002@starynkevitch.net> In-Reply-To: <4AF7BA09.3030002@starynkevitch.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200911090813.20751.ebotcazou@adacore.com> Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00233.txt.bz2 > Do you suggest your big customers to recompile their 10MLOC Ada code with > -flto? -flto doesn't work for Ada yet. -- Eric Botcazou