From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15543 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2009 17:03:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 15498 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Nov 2009 17:03:44 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from bromo.med.uc.edu (HELO bromo.med.uc.edu) (129.137.3.146) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:03:38 +0000 Received: from bromo.med.uc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bromo.med.uc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F86B005D for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:03:36 -0500 (EST) Received: (from howarth@localhost) by bromo.med.uc.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nACH3alO007570 for gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:03:36 -0500 Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:03:00 -0000 From: Jack Howarth To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: more graphite merges before gcc 4.5 branch? Message-ID: <20091112170336.GA7516@bromo.med.uc.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00351.txt.bz2 Are there any plans for further merges out of the graphite branch before gcc 4.5 is branched? I was under the impression that the graphite developers originally intended to keep trunk more closely synchronized with the graphite branch during the gcc 4.5 release cycle and this doesn't seem to have happened. It would be a shame to see graphite's performance be suboptimal for another release cycle. Jack