From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-158205-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 6420 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2009 09:06:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 6405 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Nov 2009 09:06:49 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu (HELO mx2.mail.elte.hu) (157.181.151.9)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:05:44 +0000
Received: from elvis.elte.hu ([157.181.1.14]) 	by mx2.mail.elte.hu with esmtp (Exim) 	id 1NC8Nz-0001tm-Lp 	from <mingo@elte.hu>; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:05:41 +0100
Received: by elvis.elte.hu (Postfix, from userid 1004) 	id 433C93E22E5; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:05:30 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:06:00 -0000
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, 	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, 	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, 	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>, feng.tang@intel.com, 	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, 	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>, 	David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>, 	Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>, 	Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>, jakub@redhat.com, 	gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>, 	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.32] tracing/x86: Add check to detect GCC  messing with mcount prologue
Message-ID: <20091122090531.GA21833@elte.hu>
References: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0911181933540.24119@localhost.localdomain>  <tip-887a29f59b93cf54e21814869a4ab6e80b6fa623@git.kernel.org>  <20091119072040.GA23579@elte.hu>  <alpine.LFD.2.00.0911191053390.24119@localhost.localdomain>  <alpine.LFD.2.00.0911191423190.24119@localhost.localdomain>  <1258694593.22249.1012.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>  <1258736456.22249.1032.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1258736456.22249.1032.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17)
Received-SPF: neutral (mx2.mail.elte.hu: 157.181.1.14 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of elte.hu) client-ip=157.181.1.14; envelope-from=mingo@elte.hu; helo=elvis.elte.hu;
X-ELTE-SpamScore: 0.0
X-ELTE-SpamLevel:
X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no
X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0
X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=0.0 required=5.9 tests=none autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 	_SUMMARY_
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00605.txt.bz2


* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> Ingo, Thomas and Linus,
> 
> I know Thomas did a patch to force the -mtune=generic, but just in 
> case gcc decides to do something crazy again, this patch will catch 
> it.
> 
> Should we try to get this in now?

Very nice example of defensive coding - i like this. I've queued it up 
for .33 (unless anyone objects) as i think it's too late for .32.

	Ingo