From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19442 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2010 21:13:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 19432 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Apr 2010 21:13:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (212.99.106.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:13:00 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9AFCB029A; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:12:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xdk+-0g6HD5A; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:12:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (91-171-54-31.rev.libertysurf.net [91.171.54.31]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73028CB01D6; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:12:57 +0200 (CEST) From: Eric Botcazou To: DJ Delorie Subject: Re: may_be_unaligned_p bug? Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:17:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <201004100247.o3A2lulg031852@greed.delorie.com> <201004101535.45423.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <201004122053.o3CKr1Lc016838@greed.delorie.com> In-Reply-To: <201004122053.o3CKr1Lc016838@greed.delorie.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201004122311.45942.ebotcazou@adacore.com> Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00263.txt.bz2 > I can confirm this fixes my test case. Had I known about > highest_pow2_factor() I might have come up with this myself ;-) OK, I'll do some testing with it tomorrow. Which GCC versions are affected? -- Eric Botcazou