From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12557 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2010 21:06:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 12547 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jul 2010 21:06:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from us01smtp3.synopsys.com (HELO hermes.synopsys.com) (198.182.44.81) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:06:40 +0000 Received: from maiden.synopsys.com (maiden.synopsys.com [146.225.100.170]) by hermes.synopsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235852D6B39; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:06:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from godel.synopsys.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maiden.synopsys.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA24403; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:06:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from godel.synopsys.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by godel.synopsys.com (8.13.1/8.12.3) with ESMTP id o6TL6cOj028815; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:06:38 -0700 Received: (from jbuck@localhost) by godel.synopsys.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id o6TL6TpA028810; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:06:29 -0700 Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:06:00 -0000 From: Joe Buck To: Brian Makin Cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: GFDL/GPL issues Message-ID: <20100729210629.GK17485@synopsys.com> References: <131999.55205.qm@web37601.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <131999.55205.qm@web37601.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg00427.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 01:20:45PM -0700, Brian Makin wrote: > Or to move to a better foundation? It seems to me that gcc has had various > issues for various reasons for quite a while now. RMS is all for tightly > controller yet freely distributable software. > Maybe it's time to throw more effort behind something like LLVM? This is the gcc development list. If you want to contribute to LLVM, that's fine, but if so you're on the wrong list.